-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 843
[NFC] Refactor Heap2Local logic #6473
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b9ca885
work
kripken b06f76e
work
kripken a75e5c1
work
kripken b86fcf3
builds
kripken 3e728e6
todo
kripken 5dfda8d
formt
kripken 336dfcb
work
kripken fba8353
fix.comment
kripken dfe819d
typo
kripken 517d02d
fix compiler warnings
kripken 24ac5f0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into heap2local.nfc
kripken File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's odd that the analysis depends on the rewriter. Would it be much work to factor out the parts of the rewriter that the analysis uses as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's more a matter of efficiency. To do this in a single pass versus two passes, it makes sense to check for escaping while we note what we need to fix up if we do find nothing escapes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I don't mean that we should do this in more passes, but it would be nice to move
rewriter.setsandrewriter.reachesout of the rewriter and into the analyzer instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, interesting. Yeah, maybe a larger refactoring is worthwhile here. I'll look into that and update this PR with my findings.