Add memory64 row to feature table #248
Conversation
|
Hmm I'm not sure if it's very helpful if the entire row is "unsupported" anyway. I'd rather include it once we have some engine or browser info to accompany it. |
|
Yeah, makes sense. I guess I was interested to see what other engines were doing since Wasmtime may get support soon: bytecodealliance/wasmtime#3153. Maybe it makes sense to add this row after that PR is merged? |
We note feature support only for actual (stable) releases of engines, but yeah, once it's released in Wasmtime, we can add it. |
|
Do you know what the status is for this in other engines, by chance? |
No idea, sorry. But I don't think it's implemented anywhere yet. |
|
@abrown @RReverser |
Do we have a flag to enable them yet that we can document here? Or is it still early stages? |
|
Early stages, I think. |
|
In that case let's keep this open for now till we have any flags we can provide for users to experiment with. |
|
In Wasmtime, the flag will be --enable-memory64. |
|
@abrown Is it supported in Wasmtime stable now? It appears the linked merged commit bytecodealliance/wasmtime@e0c8961 was released in 0.31.0. |
|
cc @fitzgen too for the question above |
|
Yes, it is in 0.31.0 |
|
Thanks. Anything else that landed since last update? Do you perhaps want to make a PR or should I? (happy to add this myself if this is the only change) |
|
I think that's it! So if you could add it, that would be very appreciated :) |
|
Added to this PR. |
I had not been in the loop about the status of the memory64 proposal; I was pointed to https://webassembly.org/roadmap and, not seeing it there, thought it would be helpful to add a row for it.