Airwallex: add optional products array field #5530
Merged
+127
−10
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jcreiff
reviewed
Jul 22, 2025
yunnydang
force-pushed
the
airwallex_add_product_field
branch
from
1d82f53 to
45e0905
Compare
jcreiff
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
yunnydang
force-pushed
the
airwallex_add_product_field
branch
from
45e0905 to
122496e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the optional products array field. The expected structure is defined on airwallex's documentation, but we will simply pass it through.
Local:
6387 tests, 82120 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
100% passed
Unit:
7 tests, 216 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
100% passed
Remote:
30 tests, 71 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
96.6667% passed
Note: my remote test on master fails for the same one here