Skip to content

Update connector-ldap.yml #280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2017
Merged

Update connector-ldap.yml #280

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2017

Conversation

Luci2015
Copy link
Collaborator

included some more comments for all_users_filter

include some more comments for all_users_filter
Copy link
Contributor

@adobeDan adobeDan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need to fix the English

# In order to obtain a more fine-tunned list of LDAP users, adapt the filter to your needs.
# Only resulted users from this filter predicate are ever considered by the User Sync tool;
# that is, all LDAP queries issued by User Sync include this predicate to filter out LDAP resources
# that are not subject of synchronization.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your wording is not idiomatic english and needs to be changed. How about:

Use this filter to control exactly which LDAP resources are considered for synchronization.
If a user is not accepted by this filter he will never be seen by the User Sync tool, even if
your command line specifies --users all or he is in a group you have specified in your
command line (--users group g1) or in your configuration file (for group mapping).

Wording change for all_users_filter
@adobeDan adobeDan merged commit 448d03a into adobe-apiplatform:v2 Sep 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants