Skip to content

astral-tokio-tar Vulnerable to PAX Header Desynchronization

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Oct 21, 2025 in astral-sh/tokio-tar • Updated Oct 21, 2025

Package

cargo astral-tokio-tar (Rust)

Affected versions

<= 0.5.5

Patched versions

0.5.6

Description

Summary

Versions of astral-tokio-tar prior to 0.5.6 contain a boundary parsing vulnerability that allows attackers to smuggle additional archive entries by exploiting inconsistent PAX/ustar header handling. When processing archives with PAX-extended headers containing size overrides, the parser incorrectly advances stream position based on ustar header size (often zero) instead of the PAX-specified size, causing it to interpret file content as legitimate tar headers.

This vulnerability was disclosed to multiple Rust tar parsers, all derived from the original async-tar fork of tar-rs.

Details

Vulnerability Description

The vulnerability stems from inconsistent handling of PAX extended headers versus ustar headers when determining file data boundaries. Specifically:

  1. PAX header correctly specifies the file size (e.g., size=1048576)
  2. ustar header incorrectly specifies zero size (size=000000000000)
  3. tokio-tar advances the stream position based on the ustar size (0 bytes)
  4. Inner content is then interpreted as legitimate outer archive entries

Attack Mechanism

When a TAR file contains:

  • An outer entry with PAX size=N but ustar size=0
  • File data that begins with valid TAR header structures
  • The parser treats inner content as additional outer entries

This creates a header/data desynchronization where the parser's position becomes misaligned with actual file boundaries.

Root Cause

// Vulnerable: Uses ustar size instead of PAX override
let file_size = header.size(); // Returns 0 from ustar field
let next_pos = current_pos + 512 + pad_to_512(file_size); // Advances 0 bytes

// Fixed: Apply PAX overrides before position calculation
let mut file_size = header.size();
if let Some(pax_size) = pending_pax.get("size") {
    file_size = pax_size.parse().unwrap();
}
let next_pos = current_pos + 512 + pad_to_512(file_size); // Correct advance

Impact

The impact of this vulnerability depends on where astral-tokio-tar is used, and whether it is used to extract untrusted tar archives. If used to extract untrusted inputs, it may result in unexpected attacker-controlled access to the filesystem, in turn potential resulting in arbitrary code execution or credential exfiltration.

See GHSA-w476-p2h3-79g9 for how this vulnerability affects uv, astral-tokio-tar's primary downstream user. Observe that unlike this advisory, uv's advisory is considered low severity due to overlap with intentional existing capabilities in source distributions.

Workarounds

Users are advised to upgrade to version 0.5.6 or newer to address this advisory.

There is no workaround other than upgrading.

Timeline

Date Event
Aug 21, 2025 Vulnerability discovered by Edera Security Team
Aug 21, 2025 Initial analysis and PoC confirmed
Aug 22, 2025 Maintainers notified (privately)
Aug 25, 2025 Private patch and test suite shared
Oct 7, 2025 Text freeze for GHSA
Oct 21, 2025 Coordinated public disclosure and patched releases

Credits

  • Discovered by: Steven Noonan (Edera) and Alex Zenla (Edera)
  • Coordinated disclosure: Ann Wallace (Edera)

References

@woodruffw woodruffw published to astral-sh/tokio-tar Oct 21, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 21, 2025
Reviewed Oct 21, 2025
Last updated Oct 21, 2025

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(4th percentile)

Weaknesses

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2025-62518

GHSA ID

GHSA-j5gw-2vrg-8fgx

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.