Skip to content

OpenTelemetry dotnet: OTLP exporter reads unbounded HTTP response bodies

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 23, 2026 in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet • Updated Apr 23, 2026

Package

nuget OpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocol (NuGet)

Affected versions

>= 1.13.1, < 1.15.2

Patched versions

1.15.2

Description

Summary

When exporting telemetry to a back-end/collector over gRPC or HTTP using OpenTelemetry Protocol format (OTLP), if the request results in a unsuccessful request (i.e. HTTP 4xx or 5xx), the response is read into memory with no upper-bound on the number of bytes consumed.

This could cause memory exhaustion in the consuming application if the configured back-end/collector endpoint is attacker-controlled (or a network attacker can MitM the connection) and an extremely large body is returned by the response.

Details

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet#6564 introduced a change to read the response body when a non-200 HTTP status code is received when exporting telemetry to aid debugging by operators so that the error response is included in the logs emitted by the exporter for both gRPC and HTTP/protobuf.

An unintended consequence of this change is that the response body is fully read into memory when received with no upper-bound.

This vulnerability was surfaced during the investigation of GHSA-w8rr-5gcm-pp58.

Impact

If an application using the OTLP exporter is configured to use a back-end/collector endpoint that is attacker-controlled (or a network attacker can MitM the connection) and an extremely large body is returned by the response the application could have its memory exhausted and create a denial-of-service condition.

Mitigation

The application's configured back-end/collector endpoint needs to behave maliciously. If the collector/back-end is a well-behaved implementation response bodies should not be excessively large if a request error occurs.

Workarounds

None known.

Remediation

#7017 updates the OTLP exporter for both gRPC and HTTP to:

  • Limit the number of bytes read from the response body in an error condition to 4MiB (see open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto#781);
  • Only attempt to read the response body if OpenTelemetry error logging is enabled.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 23, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 23, 2026
Reviewed Apr 23, 2026
Last updated Apr 23, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value

The product allocates memory based on an untrusted, large size value, but it does not ensure that the size is within expected limits, allowing arbitrary amounts of memory to be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-40182

GHSA ID

GHSA-q834-8qmm-v933

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.