Replace deprecated asyncio.iscoroutinefunction with its counterpart…

[layday]

… from inspect (#10634)

(cherry picked from commit 77ad7d7)

What do these changes do?

Replace asyncio.iscoroutinefunction with inspect.iscoroutinefunction

asyncio.iscoroutinefunction was deprecated in python/cpython#122875.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No.

Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?

No.

Related issue number

None.

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes
• If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
  • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
• Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES/ folder

  • name it <issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst (e.g. 588.bugfix.rst)

  • if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request
    number after creating the PR

    • .bugfix: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an
      improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match
      pre-agreed expectations.
    • .feature: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff.
    • .deprecation: A declaration of future API removals and breaking
      changes in behavior.
    • .breaking: When something public is removed in a breaking way.
      Could be deprecated in an earlier release.
    • .doc: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build
      process.
    • .packaging: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects
      and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and
      runtime assumptions.
    • .contrib: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g.
      Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development
      environment.
    • .misc: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above
      categories.

  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation,
    for example:

    Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files
    -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`.

    Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood,
    referring to what's changed compared to the last released version
    of this project.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #10663 will not alter performance

_{Comparing layday:patchback/backports/3.11/77ad7d7ea173eda1306297d275b2d5f7348f9f60/pr-10634 (0658ba3) with 3.11 (2082fba)}

Summary

✅ 51 untouched benchmarks

[Dreamsorcerer]

Hmm, tests failed on 3.11, but were fine on 3.12. Unless someone wants to investigate, can probably just drop the 3.11 backport. 3.11 probably won't last too much longer.

[layday]

PEBKAC (I copied the wrong variable name when resolving the conflict)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.09%. Comparing base (2082fba) to head (0658ba3).
Report is 43 commits behind head on 3.11.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             3.11   #10663   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.09%   98.09%           
=======================================
  Files         126      126           
  Lines       37554    37555    +1     
  Branches     4536     4536           
=======================================
+ Hits        36840    36841    +1     
  Misses        538      538           
  Partials      176      176           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	97.98% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Linux	97.68% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Windows	94.74% <85.71%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
OS-macOS	96.81% <100.00%> (+0.16%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.11	96.67% <100.00%> (+2.37%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.16	97.25% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
Py-3.11.11	97.27% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.11.9	96.74% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.12.9	97.76% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.13.2	97.74% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.9.13	96.57% <85.71%> (+2.35%)	⬆️
Py-3.9.21	97.13% <85.71%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
Py-pypy7.3.16	96.71% <85.71%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-macos	96.81% <100.00%> (+0.16%)	⬆️
VM-ubuntu	97.68% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-windows	94.74% <85.71%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.