-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Large emhaplofreq #112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Large emhaplofreq #112
Conversation
26d51bf to
3abc5e2
Compare
|
Looks like the |
I'd like to keep this branch around for a bit. |
Yes, that sounds like a good idea. I don't think it is worth spending a lot of time on the emhaplofreq-related questions for large size (but I still want to keep it around for a bit). |
My general philosophy with branches is that most should be relatively short-lived, i.e. create them when working on a feature, then merge and delete when done. Otherwise they go stale quickly. That said, I'm happy to keep longer running branches going, so long as they are kept up to date with So in that spirit, I propose that since the data files don't affect anything in the code - they should just be merged into What about the separate changes the |
556cc6d to
bc0e20b
Compare
9bea3f1 to
f7195b2
Compare
ccb1174 to
9bc6925
Compare
03e523b to
b843e38
Compare
674c73d to
4a0d41e
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
@rsingle still needed or not?
meanwhile I'll resync with
main