Skip to content

Conversation

@jannotti
Copy link
Contributor

Flakiness seemed to come from one of two places

  1. Testing balances after a proposal as sometimes wrong, if the proposer proposed AGAIN before we performed the checks.

  2. An off by one error such that if account01 (which proposed rarely) proposed in exactly the lookback'th round after burning algos, we thought it should not get paid, but it should.

Summary

Test Plan

Flakiness seemed to come from one of two places

1) Testing balances after a proposal as sometimes wrong, if the
proposer proposed AGAIN before we performed the checks.

2) An off by one error such that if account01 (which proposed rarely)
proposed in exactly the lookback'th round after burning algos, we
thought it should not get paid, but it should.
@jannotti jannotti changed the title Minimize flakiness in TestBasicPayouts Tests: Minimize flakiness in TestBasicPayouts Dec 20, 2024
@jannotti jannotti self-assigned this Dec 20, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.91%. Comparing base (005495b) to head (a2b1297).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6211      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   51.92%   51.91%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         643      643              
  Lines       86240    86240              
==========================================
- Hits        44779    44774       -5     
- Misses      38598    38599       +1     
- Partials     2863     2867       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@algorandskiy algorandskiy merged commit 6ab946d into algorand:master Jan 6, 2025
20 of 21 checks passed
@jannotti jannotti deleted the payouts-unflaky branch July 15, 2025 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants