-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 902
feat(ai-proxy): 修复 openai 配置 openaiCustomUrl 之后, 对不支持 Api 透传路径错误的问题 || feat(ai-proxy): Fixed the issue that the API pass-through path error does not support openaiCustomUrl after openai is configured. #2364
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Xijun Dai <[email protected]>
修复OpenAI自定义路径导致API路由路径错误的问题变更文件
💡 小贴士与 lingma-agents 交流的方式📜 直接回复评论
📜 在代码行处标记
📜 在讨论中提问
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔍 代码评审报告
📋 评审意见详情
💡 单文件建议
✅ 未发现需要特别关注的代码问题。
🚀 跨文件建议
以下是对代码架构和设计的综合分析,聚焦于跨文件交互、系统一致性和潜在优化空间。
🔍 1. 条件判断逻辑变更可能导致路径处理不完整
修改后的TransformRequestHeaders函数将条件从m.customPath != ""简化为m.customPath != "" && !m.isDirectCustomPath && apiName != "",可能导致以下情况未被正确处理:
- 当
m.isDirectCustomPath为true时,原逻辑会直接设置customPath,但新逻辑会跳过路径处理 - 当
apiName为空时,原逻辑会直接设置customPath,但新逻辑会跳过路径处理
这些场景可能与用户配置的openaiCustomUrl意图不符,导致API请求路径错误。
📌 关键代码:
if m.customPath != "" && !m.isDirectCustomPath && apiName != "" {
util.OverwriteRequestPathHeaderByCapability(headers, string(apiName), m.config.capabilities)
}- API名称为空的请求可能使用错误路径格式
- 需补充测试用例覆盖
isDirectCustomPath=true和apiName==""场景
🔍 2. 跨Provider的路径处理逻辑一致性风险
该修改改变了OpenAI provider的路径处理逻辑,但未检查其他AI provider(如Anthropic/Azure)是否采用相同处理模式。若其他provider仍保留原条件结构,可能导致:
- 不同服务对
customPath配置的响应方式不一致 - 配置迁移或统一管理时出现兼容性问题
需确认所有AI provider的路径处理逻辑是否需要同步调整。
- 潜在的配置冲突风险
- 需进行跨provider架构一致性评审
🔍 3. 技术债务:条件判断可读性降低
将原多分支条件合并为单条件判断,虽然减少了代码量,但隐藏了业务逻辑的关键分支(如对isDirectCustomPath的处理)。这可能导致:
- 后续维护者难以理解
!m.isDirectCustomPath的业务含义 - 配置参数变更时容易引入新问题
建议:
- 将复合条件拆分为多个布尔变量
- 添加注释说明各条件组合的业务含义
📌 关键代码:
if m.customPath != "" && !m.isDirectCustomPath && apiName != "" {- 需要额外文档补充解释条件含义
🔍 4. 测试覆盖策略不完整
当前修改未提供新增测试用例信息,可能存在以下未覆盖场景:
m.isDirectCustomPath = true时的路径处理apiName == ""时的路径处理customDomain与customPath同时配置时的组合情况
需补充测试用例覆盖这些核心配置组合,尤其是边界条件。
- 需进行全配置组合的集成测试验证
💡 小贴士
与 lingma-agents 交流的方式
📜 直接回复评论
直接回复本条评论,lingma-agents 将自动处理您的请求。例如:
-
在当前代码中添加详细的注释说明。
-
请详细介绍一下你说的 LRU 改造方案,并使用伪代码加以说明。
📜 在代码行处标记
在文件的特定位置创建评论并 @lingma-agents。例如:
-
@Lingma-Agent 分析这个方法的性能瓶颈并提供优化建议。
-
@Lingma-Agent 对这个方法生成优化代码。
📜 在讨论中提问
在任何讨论中 @lingma-agents 来获取帮助。例如:
-
@Lingma-Agent 请总结上述讨论并提出解决方案。
-
@Lingma-Agent 请根据讨论内容生成优化代码。
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2364 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 35.91% 46.07% +10.16%
===========================================
Files 69 81 +12
Lines 11576 13010 +1434
===========================================
+ Hits 4157 5995 +1838
+ Misses 7104 6670 -434
- Partials 315 345 +30 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: Xijun Dai <[email protected]>
johnlanni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…| feat(ai-proxy): Fixed the issue that the API pass-through path error does not support openaiCustomUrl after openai is configured. (alibaba#2364) Signed-off-by: Xijun Dai <[email protected]>
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
V. Special notes for reviews