Skip to content

[pull] master from conventional-changelog:master #16

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Aug 19, 2023

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

* ci: only use GH actions, ditch circleci

* ci: specify when to run GH actions

* docs: update GH actions badge

* ci: try windows test action for 3 times
@restack-app
Copy link

restack-app bot commented Aug 19, 2023

No applications have been configured for previews targeting branch: master. To do so go to restack console and configure your applications for previews.

@commit-lint
Copy link

commit-lint bot commented Aug 19, 2023

Continuous Integration

Chore

Contributors

escapedcat, renovate[bot]

Commit-Lint commands

You can trigger Commit-Lint actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @Commit-Lint merge patch will merge dependabot PR on "patch" versions (X.X.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge minor will merge dependabot PR on "minor" versions (X.Y.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge major will merge dependabot PR on "major" versions (Y.Y.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge disable will desactivate merge dependabot PR
  • @Commit-Lint review will approve dependabot PR
  • @Commit-Lint stop review will stop approve dependabot PR

@pr-code-reviewer
Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Aug 19, 2023

👋 Hi there!

  1. Add comments and documentation to explain the purpose and functionality of each section or step in the code.
  2. Consider adding error handling and logging mechanisms to capture and handle any potential issues during the execution of the commands.
  3. Evaluate if there is a need for any additional configuration settings or parameters to enhance the flexibility and customization of the code.


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

@instapr
Copy link

instapr bot commented Aug 19, 2023

The PR looks good overall. Just a couple of suggestions:

  • Could you add some inline comments explaining the changes in the code?
  • It would be helpful to include unit tests for the new functionality.

Other than that, great job!

@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Aug 19, 2023
@pr-explainer-bot
Copy link

Pull Request Review

Hey there! 👋 Here's a summary of the previous results for the Pull Request review:

Changes

  1. Removed the windows orb from the .circleci/config.yml file.
  2. Updated the on section in the .github/workflows/CI.yml file to trigger the workflow only on push to the master branch and pull_request events with types opened and synchronize.
  3. Updated the badge for Github Actions in the README.md file.
  4. Removed the CircleCI and AppVeyor badges.

Suggestions

  1. In the .circleci/config.yml file, consider adding a step to restore the cache before running the tests.
  2. In the .github/workflows/CI.yml file, consider adding a step to set the max_attempts to 3 for the actions/checkout action.
  3. In the README.md file, consider using a relative path to the Github Actions badge file instead of the full URL.
  4. Consider adding alt text to the badges in the README.md file for accessibility purposes.

Bugs

  1. In the .circleci/config.yml file, there is a potential bug in the save-cache step. The arch variable is not defined.
  2. In the .github/workflows/CI.yml file, there is a potential bug in the uses step. The node --version command is not properly indented.
  3. There are no potential bugs mentioned in the code.

Improvements

  1. In the .circleci/config.yml file, the run-all job can be refactored for better readability. Here's the updated code snippet:
- name: Run all steps
  run: |
    checkout
    restore_cache:
      keys:
        - v1-dependencies-{{ checksum "yarn.lock" }}
    update-yarn
    install
    save-cache
    build
    lint
    format
    deps
    test
  1. In the README.md file, the code snippet for the Github Actions badge can be refactored for better readability. Replace:
[![Github Actions][4]][5]

with:

[![Github Actions](https://github.com/conventional-changelog/commitlint/actions/workflows/CI.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/conventional-changelog/commitlint/actions/workflows/CI.yml)

Rating

Overall code rating: 7.5 out of 10. The code is generally readable, but there are some areas that could be improved. The performance and security aspects seem to be fine.

That's it for the summary! Let me know if you need any further assistance. 😄

renovate bot added 3 commits August 19, 2023 11:46
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@ammar-ahmed-butt ammar-ahmed-butt merged commit b110d4a into ammar-knowledge:master Aug 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants