Fix ad5064 regulator #204
Merged
Fix ad5064 regulator #204
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ply" This reverts commit 106b886. This patch was only in the ADI tree and will be replaced by something else for upstream. Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>
The correct way to handle errors returned by regualtor_get() and friends is to propagate the error since that means that an regulator was specified, but something went wrong when requesting it. For handling optional regulators, e.g. when the device has an internal vref, regulator_get_optional() should be used to avoid getting the dummy regulator that the regulator core otherwise provides. Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
stefpopa
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2018
Contributor
|
Will merge later today if no objections |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2025
Fix a loop scenario of ethx:egress->ethx:egress
Example setup to reproduce:
tc qdisc add dev ethx root handle 1: drr
tc filter add dev ethx parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 matchall \
action mirred egress redirect dev ethx
Now ping out of ethx and you get a deadlock:
[ 116.892898][ T307] ============================================
[ 116.893182][ T307] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 116.893418][ T307] 6.18.0-rc6-01205-ge05021a829b8-dirty #204 Not tainted
[ 116.893682][ T307] --------------------------------------------
[ 116.893926][ T307] ping/307 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 116.894133][ T307] ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.894517][ T307]
[ 116.894517][ T307] but task is already holding lock:
[ 116.894836][ T307] ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.895252][ T307]
[ 116.895252][ T307] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 116.895608][ T307] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 116.895608][ T307]
[ 116.895901][ T307] CPU0
[ 116.896057][ T307] ----
[ 116.896200][ T307] lock(&sch->root_lock_key);
[ 116.896392][ T307] lock(&sch->root_lock_key);
[ 116.896605][ T307]
[ 116.896605][ T307] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 116.896605][ T307]
[ 116.896864][ T307] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 116.896864][ T307]
[ 116.897123][ T307] 6 locks held by ping/307:
[ 116.897302][ T307] #0: ffff88800b4b0250 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0xb20/0x2cf0
[ 116.897808][ T307] #1: ffffffff88c839c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: ip_output+0xa9/0x600
[ 116.898138][ T307] #2: ffffffff88c839c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x2c6/0x1ee0
[ 116.898459][ T307] #3: ffffffff88c83960 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x200/0x3b50
[ 116.898782][ T307] #4: ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899132][ T307] #5: ffffffff88c83960 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x200/0x3b50
[ 116.899442][ T307]
[ 116.899442][ T307] stack backtrace:
[ 116.899667][ T307] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 307 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-01205-ge05021a829b8-dirty #204 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[ 116.899672][ T307] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 116.899675][ T307] Call Trace:
[ 116.899678][ T307] <TASK>
[ 116.899680][ T307] dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xb0
[ 116.899688][ T307] print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xdc
[ 116.899695][ T307] __lock_acquire+0x11f7/0x1be0
[ 116.899704][ T307] lock_acquire+0x162/0x300
[ 116.899707][ T307] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899713][ T307] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 116.899717][ T307] ? stack_trace_save+0x93/0xd0
[ 116.899723][ T307] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
[ 116.899728][ T307] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899731][ T307] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
Fixes: 178ca30 ("Revert "net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion"")
Tested-by: Victor Nogueira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The correct way to handle errors returned by regualtor_get() and friends is
to propagate the error since that means that an regulator was specified,
but something went wrong when requesting it.
For handling optional regulators, e.g. when the device has an internal
vref, regulator_get_optional() should be used to avoid getting the dummy
regulator that the regulator core otherwise provides.
Will be sent upstream after review.