chore(routes): remove lazy route prefix

[Brocco]

No description provided.

[johnpapa]

LGTM

[elvirdolic]

@Brocco what are the reasons for this Pull Request? Are there any instructions/migration steps for us who have already routes with (+) prefix?

[intellix]

@elvirdolic You need to migrate to NgModule first :) The old router lazy loaded components by expecting a + folder prefix. New router just lazy-loads modules at the specified location.

[Brocco]

@elvirdolic the + prefix for lazy routes was a convention devised for a previous version of the router and before the concept of NgModules was introduced.

The idea of that indicator no longer makes sense. Lazy routes are now associated to lazy modules and the need for this indicator is no longer necessary.

[Meligy]

Don't you think a naming convention for lazy loading would be useful?

This is probably a styleguide question though, which I'm not sure where will be best to discuss.

[bobrosoft]

I think naming convention for that kind of stuff was a bad idea, so I completely agree with that PR.

[angular-automatic-lock-bot]

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

_{This action has been performed automatically by a bot.}