Skip to content

docs: adding a commit-naming conventions section and updating links.rst and basics.rst #441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

clatapie
Copy link
Contributor

As some repositories are enforcing the conventional-commit standards, this PR is to add a mention about it within our documentation.

@clatapie clatapie self-assigned this Apr 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 23, 2024
Copy link
Member

@RobPasMue RobPasMue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@clatapie clatapie changed the title docs: adding a commit-naming conventions section docs: adding a commit-naming conventions section and updating links.rst and basics.rst Apr 24, 2024
@clatapie clatapie enabled auto-merge (squash) April 24, 2024 15:58
@clatapie clatapie merged commit 5a7c4fa into main Apr 24, 2024
10 checks passed
@clatapie clatapie deleted the doc/naming_conventions branch April 24, 2024 16:01
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
…s.rst` and `basics.rst` (#441)

* doc: adding a `commit-naming conventions` section

* fix: Vale check

* doc: updating `basic.rst` and `links.rst`

* docs: fixing contributing link in doc

* Update doc/source/getting-started/basic.rst

Co-authored-by: Revathy Venugopal <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Revathy Venugopal <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants