Skip to content

HADOOP-17317. [JDK 11] Upgrade dnsjava to remove illegal access warnings #6981

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

adoroszlai
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Backport HADOOP-17317 to branch-3.3.

@adoroszlai adoroszlai added the backport Backport PR; reviews may be optional depending on nature of backport label Aug 5, 2024
@adoroszlai adoroszlai self-assigned this Aug 5, 2024
@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 10m 23s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 1s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗 xmllint 0m 0s xmllint was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 test4tests 0m 0s The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
_ branch-3.3 Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 13m 42s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 39m 28s branch-3.3 passed
+1 💚 compile 20m 48s branch-3.3 passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 3m 7s branch-3.3 passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 3m 0s branch-3.3 passed
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 4s branch-3.3 passed
+0 🆗 spotbugs 0m 42s branch/hadoop-project no spotbugs output file (spotbugsXml.xml)
+1 💚 shadedclient 40m 49s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 35s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 39s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 20m 19s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 20m 19s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 2m 55s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 2m 59s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 2m 0s the patch passed
+0 🆗 spotbugs 0m 34s hadoop-project has no data from spotbugs
+1 💚 shadedclient 40m 28s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 0m 34s hadoop-project in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 18m 46s hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 1m 24s hadoop-registry in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 59s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
237m 59s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6981/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #6981
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets xmllint
uname Linux b1d9cc8b1272 5.15.0-94-generic #104-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 9 15:25:40 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision branch-3.3 / 9eb1ef0
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u372-gaus1-0ubuntu118.04-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6981/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3137 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-project hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common hadoop-common-project/hadoop-registry U: .
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6981/1/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.0 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@adoroszlai adoroszlai merged commit 870a216 into apache:branch-3.3 Aug 6, 2024
3 checks passed
@adoroszlai adoroszlai deleted the HADOOP-17317_branch-3.3 branch August 6, 2024 05:51
@adoroszlai
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @slfan1989 for the review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Backport PR; reviews may be optional depending on nature of backport
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants