HADOOP-19431. [JDK17] Upgrade JUnit from 4 to 5 in hadoop-distcp Part2.

[slfan1989]

Description of PR

JIRA: HADOOP-19431. [JDK17] Upgrade JUnit from 4 to 5 in hadoop-distcp Part2.

How was this patch tested?

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

🎊 +1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 49s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	43m 9s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 31s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	compile	0m 30s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 28s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 33s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 33s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 27s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚	spotbugs	0m 48s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	40m 48s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 23s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 23s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javac	0m 23s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 21s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚	javac	0m 21s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 16s		the patch passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 23s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 21s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 19s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚	spotbugs	0m 48s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	40m 27s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	26m 56s		hadoop-distcp in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 37s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		162m 0s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.50 ServerAPI=1.50 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7747/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#7747
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname	Linux 9fb5d63317d7 5.15.0-138-generic #148-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 14 19:05:48 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / f4c3520
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7747/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	527 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-tools/hadoop-distcp U: hadoop-tools/hadoop-distcp
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7747/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[slfan1989]

@cnauroth Could you please help review this PR? Thank you very much!

[cnauroth]

+1. Thank you @slfan1989 .

[zhtttylz]

+1,LGTM @slfan1989

[slfan1989]

@cnauroth @zhtttylz Thank you very much for the review!