Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 20, 2018. It is now read-only.

Use X509Certificate2 instead of X509Certificate #279

Closed
blowdart opened this issue Apr 16, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Use X509Certificate2 instead of X509Certificate #279

blowdart opened this issue Apr 16, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Tratcher
Labels
3 - Done bug
Milestone
1.0.0-beta5

Comments

@blowdart
Copy link
Member

X509Certificate2 is preferably as it adds properties, rather than methods to get common fields (like valid from, valid to, subject etc.) In addition it provides Authority Key ID and Key usage, (key usage being especially important).

X509Certifcate2 subclasses X509Certificate should it should be an easy enough upgrade,.
@blowdart blowdart changed the title Use X509Certificate2 instead to X509Certificate Use X509Certificate2 instead of X509Certificate Apr 16, 2015
@Tratcher Tratcher mentioned this issue Apr 21, 2015
Closed
Tratcher added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2015
@Tratcher
#277 Rename IHttpClientCertificateFeature. #279 prefer X509Certificate2.
117486d
@Tratcher Tratcher mentioned this issue Apr 28, 2015
Closed
Tratcher added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2015
@Tratcher
#277 Rename IHttpClientCertificateFeature. #279 prefer X509Certificate2.
a784283
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

@Tratcher wasn't this done?

@Tratcher Tratcher added this to the 1.0.0-beta5 milestone Jun 7, 2015
@Tratcher Tratcher self-assigned this Jun 7, 2015
@Tratcher Tratcher closed this as completed Jun 7, 2015
@danroth27 danroth27 added bug and removed enhancement labels Jun 30, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@Tratcher Tratcher

Labels
3 - Done bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0-beta5
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@davidfowl @blowdart @Tratcher @danroth27