-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 523
Conversation
Currently testing 1.2M application messages on the websockets per second; tested 1,070,637,277 messages so far, seems happy; will leave it running overnight. |
Fell over ticking into 10 billion messages; but that was an overflow on how I was recording, otherwise seems good. |
Hmm, over 10Bn messages on a restart - maybe I shouldn't have tweeted the url... :P |
Nothing like Twitter for free load testing! |
Can we get a regression test? |
Can do a filter that's unhappy with null buffers? I have a love hate relationship with ssl... |
Whatever works. Maybe you can unit test |
Was having trouble recreating the error state in a test; but narrowed down; its from a combination of 101Bn messages tested so far; some issues; need to look into if its NPC load or WebSocketMiddleware - but working mostly - error rate is low for that number of messages :) |
@halter73 can I pull in the |
@benaadams I think that would be fine, but may be more complicated than what is necessary. I was suggesting something simple like:
Of course, if you want to add a functional test too, I'm not going to stop you! |
@benaadams No, this repo can't depend on the WebSocket repo. You could write the test in the WebSocket repo though. |
@halter73 did as you suggested. Test fails without the change; passes with it. |
Awesome. I'll merge this today. |
Giving AppVeyor a force push (rebase) |
Resolves #438
vs the Exception thrown in #438; Websocket comms then works fine over Ssl; tested for 5mins as shown above
Request finished in 340969ms 101