Skip to content

Revert "fix: Properly configure SDK to be distributed as ESM" #2046

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

frederikprijck
Copy link
Member

@frederikprijck frederikprijck commented Apr 8, 2025

Opening a PR to revert the ESM changes, as there seem to be issues with using the getSession in tools for Gen AI.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 57.14286% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.68%. Comparing base (c6947e2) to head (cf766f9).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/client/helpers/get-access-token.ts 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/client/index.ts 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/server/index.ts 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2046   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.68%   79.68%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        1925     1925           
  Branches      316      316           
=======================================
  Hits         1534     1534           
  Misses        385      385           
  Partials        6        6           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@frederikprijck frederikprijck marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2025 15:37
@frederikprijck frederikprijck requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2025 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants