Skip to content

Fix: keyword arguments to submit #384

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ravinkohli merged 4 commits into from
Feb 18, 2022
Merged

Fix: keyword arguments to submit #384

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3808a39
Fix: keyword arguments to submit
eddiebergman Feb 18, 2022
24c24eb
Fix: Missing param for implementing AbstractTA
eddiebergman Feb 18, 2022
c44b40a
Fix: Typing of multi_objectives
eddiebergman Feb 18, 2022
3935141
Add: mutli_objectives to each ExecuteTaFucnWithQueue
eddiebergman Feb 18, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions autoPyTorch/utils/single_thread_client.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,8 +61,24 @@ def submit(
func: Callable,
*args: List,
priority: int = 0,
key: Any = None,
workers: Any = None,
resources: Any = None,
retries: Any = None,
fifo_timeout: Any = "100 ms",
allow_other_workers: Any = False,
actor: Any = False,
actors: Any = False,
pure: Any = None,

@ravinkohli ravinkohli Feb 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we also need to add multi_objectives to this list as the github actions raise E TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'multi_objectives'

@eddiebergman eddiebergman Feb 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's unfortunately a seperate problem -_-

@ravinkohli ravinkohli Feb 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, thanks for this fix. Lets merge this when we have resolved this issue as well. Btw, let me know if you need help with this error.

@eddiebergman eddiebergman Feb 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It likely effects autosklearn as well so I'll update this PR when I find it

@ravinkohli ravinkohli Feb 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay thanks

@eddiebergman eddiebergman Feb 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Think I fixed it, there are now timeouts occurring though which seem to be another seperate issue.

**kwargs: Any,
) -> Any:
"""
Note
----
The keyword arguments caught in `dask.distributed.Client` need to
be specified here so they don't get passed in as ``**kwargs`` to the
``func``.
"""
return DummyFuture(func(*args, **kwargs))

def close(self) -> None:
Expand Down