Skip to content

feat: Make sure that storm caching settings are resonable #285

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

seebees
Copy link
Contributor

@seebees seebees commented Sep 12, 2024

It was possible to configure a hierarchical keyring with storm tracking settings that resulted in
poor caching performance.

If the grace period is greater than the TTL,
this results in items being immediately retried.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Check any applicable:

  • Were any files moved? Moving files changes their URL, which breaks all hyperlinks to the files.

It was possible to configure a hierarchical keyring
with storm tracking settings that resulted in
poor caching performance.

If the grace period is greater than the TTL,
this results in items being immediately retried.
@seebees seebees requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2024 03:46
Copy link
Contributor Author

@seebees seebees left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like your changes

@ajewellamz ajewellamz merged commit bd9acf0 into master Oct 2, 2024
4 checks passed
@ajewellamz ajewellamz deleted the seebees/hierarchical-caching-settings branch October 2, 2024 18:36
texastony pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
* feat: Make sure that storm caching settings are reasonable

It was possible to configure a hierarchical keyring
with storm tracking settings that resulted in
poor caching performance.

If the grace period is greater than the TTL,
this results in items being immediately retried.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants