-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
revpi-core-se: Added support for revpi-core-se device #1285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This adds supports for revpi-core-se. These changes were done by looking at the PR for the revpi-core-3. Changelog-entry: Added support for revpi-core-se device Signed-off-by: Reynan Valencia <[email protected]>
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
8 similar comments
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
A repository maintainer needs to approve these workflow run(s). To approve, maintainers can either: • Submit an approval review on this pull request, OR • Submit a review comment starting with Then re-run the failed job(s) via the Checks tab above. Reviews must be on the specific commit SHA of the workflow run to be considered. |
|
@floion Could you please review and approve this PR so the CI can run? Thanks! |
|
@alexgg @nbuchwitz Could you please review this PR? |
|
hey @reynanvalencianexxtlab, unfortunately adding support for a new board is a bit more convoluted. Before we deploy support for a new board publicly we need to have it pass our certification tests which involves setting up a test harness and passing automation tests. I'm sure you'll understand that we need to make sure that any OS image that can be used in production by our customers and is going to be maintained by Balena in the long run needs to meet certain quality. What I suggest is that you contact us via our support channels so we can guide you in this process. |
|
hello @alexgg , support ticket created. Thanks |
This adds supports for revpi-core-se. These changes were done by looking at the PR for the revpi-core-3.
Changelog-entry: Added support for revpi-core-se device