Skip to content

rule's "scalacopts" should get higher priority than toolchain "scalacopts" #382

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
or-shachar opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@or-shachar
Copy link
Contributor

In scalacopts there are some options that can be overridden by their last occurrance and some options that are aggregated

We need a test that makes sure that options that come from library rule scalacopts comes after any option that comes from toolchain's scalacopts

On #364 I did not add such test and I think it should be added.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant