add 0.6.0 to travis

[johnynek]

No description provided.

[johnynek]

@damienmg looks like the osx box is in a bad state again.

[damienmg]

/cc @katre maybe just turn off the slave until Monday?

[katre]

I fixed the darwin-x86_64-1 node.

[johnynek]

@azymnis let's see if using workers can make a big impact. It should since most of the test examples are so small, the JIT'ed worker should really jam on it.

Also, since we actually use workers almost always internally, it is better to actually test with workers, in my view.

[johnynek]

okay, using workers seems dramatically faster (shocker). This should help the timeouts @azymnis

After this is green, I'll merge, if you merge this in maybe it won't timeout.

[johnynek]

@ittaiz what do you think?

[azymnis]

@johnynek sure, I'll just merge this in my branch if that's ok

[johnynek]

sure. Merge this in yours is fine. It should get you green.

…

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Argyris Zymnis ***@***.***> wrote: @johnynek <https://github.com/johnynek> sure, I'll just merge this in my branch if that's ok — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#285 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJdoVNwitUAFgVNbt8G6U9YwSDWlE3ks5snVtHgaJpZM4Po9K-> .

-- P. Oscar Boykin, Ph.D. | http://twitter.com/posco | http://pobox.com/~boykin

[johnynek]

@ittaiz is you merge this, can you do a regular merge? We now have two downstream PRs branching off this and doing a squash or rebase will complicate things there.

#286 and #281 are both using this to get a faster build.