Skip to content

Generate documentation with Skydoc. #28

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2017

Conversation

davidzchen
Copy link
Member

Fixes #12

@davidzchen
Copy link
Member Author

The CI failure is due to the fact that we are using tag 0.0.1 of rules_sass in skydoc, and we haven't cut a new release after the fix for adding cfg was checked in.

Let's merge bazelbuild/rules_sass#7, cut a release, update skydoc to use the new version of rules_sass, cut a new release of skydoc, and update this PR.

@damienmg
Copy link
Collaborator

damienmg commented Feb 9, 2017 via email

@davidzchen davidzchen force-pushed the skydoc branch 2 times, most recently from e5b6700 to 90d7d52 Compare February 9, 2017 20:25
@davidzchen
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, Damien. We still need a new release of skydoc with the recent fixes. The build is failing due to using an old version of protobuf. Sent bazelbuild/skydoc#41

@davidzchen
Copy link
Member Author

Tests are passing. PTAL

WORKSPACE Outdated
remote = "https://github.com/bazelbuild/skydoc.git",
tag = "0.1.2",
)
load("@io_bazel_skydoc//skylark:skylark.bzl", "skydoc_repositories")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: space before load (also upper).

maybe pass buildifier on this file?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. Ran buildifier.

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't that file be only on the site branch? Or maybe only have the readme checked in that redirect to the website?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can publish from a directory in the master branch now. :)

https://help.github.com/articles/configuring-a-publishing-source-for-github-pages/

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@davidzchen davidzchen merged commit d5fe629 into bazelbuild:master Feb 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants