Skip to content

Add more solid and generic process wrapper #372

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 22, 2020

Conversation

jelmansouri
Copy link
Contributor

The new process wrapper is in the process of being reviewed so it can be part of the skylib, in the meantime, some work have been invested in making it more solid, and some functionality like capturing the std output of the child process have been added.
This will allow us to use it to call rustfmt.

@jelmansouri jelmansouri changed the title Adding a more solid and generic process wrapper to be used with rustfmt rules Add more solid and generic process wrapper Jul 17, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@damienmg damienmg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall I don't see any blockers, however if you don't mind, could we add a bit more explanation to errors and let @epigramengineer test this one?

Copy link
Collaborator

@damienmg damienmg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As it passes all the test, I am fine with this PR, I am going to wait another day for @epigramengineer to chime in on #375 before merging this one.

@jelmansouri
Copy link
Contributor Author

So tried from a clean Linux VM to make sure that everything in a minimalist project work. And it seems to be fine, not that it worked also without this PR.
The machine had only build-essential and bazel installed.

@damienmg
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok we are one day later, so let's merge this one.

@damienmg damienmg merged commit 09ec54c into bazelbuild:master Jul 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants