Update trufflehog to 3.90.8

[blsaccess]

This PR uses https://api.github.com/repos/trufflesecurity/trufflehog/releases/latest to obtain the latest version of trufflehog and update the version in bbot/modules/trufflehog.py.

Release notes:

What's Changed

• Pre-filter GitHub v1 findings to prevent large numbers of validation requests by @trufflesteeeve in Pre-filter GitHub v1 findings to prevent large numbers of validation requests trufflesecurity/trufflehog#4468

Full Changelog: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@v3.90.7...v3.90.8

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing dev (baseline) vs update-trufflehog (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name	📏 Base	📏 Current	📈 Change	🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance	4.17ms	4.15ms	-0.5% ⚪	✅
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force	18.28ms	17.80ms	-2.6% ⚪	✅
Large Closest Match Lookup	355.19ms	355.54ms	+0.1% ⚪	✅
Realistic Closest Match Workload	192.81ms	192.56ms	-0.1% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch	437.28ms	446.07ms	+2.0% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch	771.66ms	772.93ms	+0.2% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Small	30.79ms	30.29ms	-1.6% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Large	318.03ms	310.93ms	-2.2% ⚪	✅
Make Event Explicit Types	13.94ms	13.78ms	-1.2% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Small	3.945s	3.964s	+0.5% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Large	9.338s	9.251s	-0.9% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small	4.092s	4.124s	+0.8% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large	7.097s	7.161s	+0.9% ⚪	✅
Is Ip Performance	3.08ms	3.15ms	+2.3% ⚪	✅
Make Ip Type Performance	11.29ms	11.40ms	+1.0% ⚪	✅
Mixed Ip Operations	4.42ms	4.43ms	+0.1% ⚪	✅
Typical Queue Shuffle	62.30µs	62.97µs	+1.1% ⚪	✅
Priority Queue Shuffle	694.36µs	715.00µs	+3.0% ⚪	✅

🎯 Performance Summary

✅ No significant performance changes detected (all changes <10%)

---

🐍 Python Version 3.11.13

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92%. Comparing base (de57be6) to head (41031fd).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev   #2702   +/-   ##
=====================================
- Coverage     92%     92%   -0%     
=====================================
  Files        411     411           
  Lines      33951   33951           
=====================================
- Hits       31020   30993   -27     
- Misses      2931    2958   +27     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.