Skip to content

Conversation

nicoske
Copy link
Contributor

@nicoske nicoske commented Sep 5, 2025

According to RFC 4566, the repeat time field r=<interval> <duration> [<offsets>...] allows optional offsets. The fix allows r=0 0 which means "no repeat times".

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.92%. Comparing base (a8513af) to head (29021c9).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #880   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.92%   80.92%           
=======================================
  Files         128      128           
  Lines       14323    14323           
=======================================
  Hits        11591    11591           
  Misses       2206     2206           
  Partials      526      526           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@aler9
Copy link
Member

aler9 commented Sep 5, 2025

merged, thank you very much!

@aler9 aler9 merged commit 1bc8966 into bluenviron:main Sep 5, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SDP parser rejects valid "r=0 0" repeat time field
2 participants