Skip to content

Conversation

@briansmith
Copy link
Owner

@briansmith briansmith commented Oct 28, 2025

This reverts commit 9b3ef1b. It seems like the casts in the loop violate strict aliasing rules.

This may result in a performance regression when GCC is used instead of Clang, as this code path was added specifically for GCC.

This reverts commit 9b3ef1b. It seems like
the casts in the loop violate strict aliasing rules.

This may result in a performance regression when GCC is used instead of
Clang, as this code path was added specifically for GCC to address this
performance difference.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.68%. Comparing base (59f2370) to head (8ffcc7d).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2735      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.64%   96.68%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         199      199              
  Lines       20311    20301      -10     
  Branches      524      524              
==========================================
  Hits        19629    19629              
+ Misses        568      558      -10     
  Partials      114      114              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@MichaIng
Copy link

It seems BoringSSL found some alternative fix:

@briansmith
Copy link
Owner Author

I think that one isn't relevant to this, right?

That is addressing a different issue in the same function; see PR #2734.

@MichaIng
Copy link

Got it, thought it might be all related to the same underlying issue, and hence potentially a way to fix the issue without performance regression.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants