Skip to content

filip(fix): apply EAA amends #2072

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fstoqnov-iohk
Copy link
Collaborator

Added aria labels to carousel buttons
Added aria labels to logo links
Added alt text to homepage images
Updated redundant alt text on Navigation logo image

Adjusted heading order on homepage to ensure sequental ordering

Contrast:
Default ‘hover’/‘selected’/‘active’ colour has too low a contrast ratio with the white background
across the site
Footer CTA and copyright have too low a contrast ratio with the white background on all
non-homepage pages


both currently not in line with
WCAG AA and AAA standards

Lighthouse score is now an overall 96 for Accessibility on Homepage and 92 on all other pages

Copy link

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at 2025-06-16 13:58:12.764841621 UTC
Max. memory units 14000000
Max. CPU units 10000000000
Max. tx size (kB) 16384

Script summary

Name Hash Size (Bytes)
νInitial c8a101a5c8ac4816b0dceb59ce31fc2258e387de828f02961d2f2045 2652
νCommit 61458bc2f297fff3cc5df6ac7ab57cefd87763b0b7bd722146a1035c 685
νHead be6ebc744208c660bf0fdc1cfbb5157477cd305de5b1777e575cbb4c 14665
μHead 1f47a42d1d6edc32ccd834acb19d5db3b2a5232f0bd7eaa8908dc519* 5284
νDeposit ae01dade3a9c346d5c93ae3ce339412b90a0b8f83f94ec6baa24e30c 1102
  • The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5836 10.44 3.31 0.52
2 6035 12.20 3.85 0.54
3 6239 14.68 4.64 0.58
5 6640 18.47 5.82 0.63
10 7647 28.89 9.10 0.79
43 14279 98.91 30.91 1.80

Commit transaction costs

This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.

UTxO Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 558 2.44 1.16 0.20
2 742 3.38 1.73 0.22
3 920 4.36 2.33 0.24
5 1274 6.41 3.60 0.28
10 2166 12.13 7.25 0.40
54 10067 98.61 68.52 1.88

CollectCom transaction costs

Parties UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 57 525 25.20 7.30 0.43
2 113 636 34.20 9.84 0.53
3 170 747 41.11 11.90 0.60
4 227 858 50.75 14.57 0.70
5 285 969 56.50 16.40 0.77
6 341 1081 64.75 18.82 0.86
7 394 1192 77.33 22.24 0.99
8 450 1303 96.54 27.28 1.18
10 560 1529 99.68 28.62 1.23

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 1794 23.78 7.94 0.48
2 2016 26.73 9.58 0.52
3 2086 27.18 10.32 0.54
5 2412 30.94 12.93 0.60
10 3215 40.74 19.61 0.76
41 7775 99.93 59.50 1.73

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 598 22.50 7.27 0.41
2 774 25.45 8.75 0.45
3 823 23.95 8.98 0.44
5 1199 29.00 11.73 0.52
10 1833 36.32 17.11 0.65
40 6371 94.68 53.37 1.58

Close transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 651 28.99 9.24 0.48
2 812 29.03 9.99 0.49
3 973 30.76 11.21 0.52
5 1323 35.38 14.17 0.60
10 2230 49.40 22.26 0.81
36 5880 95.74 54.49 1.58

Contest transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 698 33.73 10.52 0.53
2 858 36.33 12.06 0.57
3 998 38.37 13.35 0.60
5 1289 42.51 16.01 0.67
10 2032 53.70 22.90 0.84
30 5042 99.54 50.81 1.54

Abort transaction costs

There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5778 27.01 9.04 0.69
2 5911 35.76 11.96 0.79
3 6010 44.63 14.94 0.88
4 6088 52.42 17.47 0.97
5 6376 64.86 21.78 1.11
6 6426 72.70 24.40 1.20
7 6636 84.35 28.33 1.33
8 6748 89.72 30.16 1.39
9 6671 86.93 29.06 1.36

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.

Parties UTxO UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
10 1 57 5869 20.78 7.06 0.63
10 5 284 6003 29.80 10.58 0.73
10 10 570 6174 38.64 14.15 0.84
10 30 1706 6853 80.27 30.53 1.32
10 39 2223 7162 99.44 38.05 1.54

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2025-06-16 14:01:02.158855831 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 4.482365893
P99 8.013755189999994ms
P95 5.65875835ms
P50 4.2487525ms
Number of Invalid txs 0

Memory data

Time Used Free
2025-06-16 13:59:47.166485784 UTC 0m 0;
2025-06-16 13:59:52.166458232 UTC 12 0;
2025-06-16 13:59:57.166429474 UTC 6 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:02.166471166 UTC 1 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:07.166439516 UTC 1 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:12.166422793 UTC 1 0;

Three local nodes

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 28.420566245
P99 44.87088228999999ms
P95 39.09702245ms
P50 26.8424765ms
Number of Invalid txs 0

Memory data

Time Used Free
2025-06-16 14:00:25.4979662 UTC 0m 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:30.498723745 UTC 10 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:35.499172088 UTC 6 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:40.497912901 UTC 22 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:45.498028796 UTC 15 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:50.498068069 UTC 2 0;
2025-06-16 14:00:55.498066221 UTC 2 0;
2025-06-16 14:01:00.498041825 UTC 2 0;

Copy link

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

Copy link
Contributor

@v0d1ch v0d1ch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @fstoqnov-iohk !

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Triage 🏥 to In review 👀 in ☕ Hydra Team Work Jul 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In review 👀
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants