Skip to content

Conversation

@nofiv
Copy link
Contributor

@nofiv nofiv commented Jul 22, 2019

Satisfyingly solves #961 for x86 architecture. Other architectures could be implemented later on.

@serpilliere
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @nofiv,
Thank you for the PR. We will look at this next week !

@XVilka
Copy link
Contributor

XVilka commented Mar 5, 2020

@nofiv could you please add a couple tests for these BB manipulation improvements?

@serpilliere
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for this, but we haven't taken time to analyze the new interface introduced by the PR (shame on me). Maybe we have to this before any rebase.

@nofiv
Copy link
Contributor Author

nofiv commented Mar 10, 2020

I'd like to know whether you want to add-in such a feature in the first place. If you want to, I'll create the tests and solve possible bugs (I'm not sure whether this version moved call instructions correctly).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants