Skip to content

Conversation

@wp99cp
Copy link
Member

@wp99cp wp99cp commented Jul 31, 2022

What's new with this release

  • Improved point selecting algorithm (@wp99cp)
  • Improved point naming algorithm (@wp99cp)
  • New interactive map based on OpenLayers (@wp99cp)
  • Fix compatibility issues with windows (@maede97)
  • Multiple Bug fixes

Preview

A preview of this version is hosted at https://dev.map.cevi.tools/.

Open Todo's

  • End-to-End test using multiple GPX and KML files
  • Check performance with multiple users interacting with the containers
  • Check and update documentation. Are all commands still valid? --> no, they are not (see problems with c078b8d). @maede97 what should we do here, switch back to English or update the documentation as well?
  • Bump version number

Known Issues

wp99cp and others added 30 commits November 2, 2021 19:33
- add missing imports, requirements etc.
with version 2.2.0 some braking changes were made, this commit fixes them
known issues:

- existing docker containers are broken
- logging not fully working
- index creation takes very long
- data source is not included in repo and fetching script is missing
- other smaller bugs possible...
- small script that converts a GPX file to a JSON (in LV95 format)
- remove old prerequisites: those two points are no longer needed as the functionality is now extracted to a separate docker container
- creates a new docker container containing the code for the name finding
- exposes a simple API to query swiss names
- code refactorization
- include API call to walk-time table generation procedure -> application is now running again.
- add logging
- eager caching of index, keep index in memory even after a request
- add street intersections
- add leisure areals
- improve forest entry names by adding flurname
- simplifies the way point selection algorithm and fixes #71
@wp99cp wp99cp requested a review from maede97 August 3, 2022 14:27
maede97
maede97 previously approved these changes Aug 4, 2022
Copy link
Member

@maede97 maede97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also:

  • Ich habe mal den ersten Batch der Files durchgesehen. Grundsätzlich voll i.O., nur "minor typos".
  • Stresstest mit 4 Tabs gleichzeitig war auch super erfolgreich und gab keine Fehler!
  • Ich glaube, es ist ready to merge!

@maede97 maede97 linked an issue Aug 4, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@maede97 maede97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not tried yet, but just an idea - why not link to the repo at the current commit?

Yes, this is indeed working.

Co-authored-by: Matthias Hüppi <[email protected]>
@wp99cp wp99cp marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2022 07:56
Copy link
Member

@maede97 maede97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@wp99cp wp99cp merged commit 1722fa2 into master Aug 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

During a parallel Stress Test the following Exception was thrown

3 participants