Add descriptions for new output fields#187
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This is something that LGTM turned up.
Member
Author
|
This pull request fixes 1 alert when merging e656fd2 into cd5d0c9 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
Comment posted by LGTM.com |
dav3r
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2019
dav3r
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM except for the small typo that I noted.
Member
Author
|
This pull request fixes 1 alert when merging 7054602 into cd5d0c9 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
Comment posted by LGTM.com |
Member
Author
|
This pull request fixes 1 alert when merging d7b6165 into cd5d0c9 - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
Comment posted by LGTM.com |
cisagovbot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
Use an Action to install Packer in our GitHub Actions workflows
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cc @echudow
I took a stab at adding descriptions for the new output fields in the README. Please review and let me know (or commit) if anything is not accurate.