Skip to content

doc: fix step_lag_difference example #349

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 27, 2024
Merged

doc: fix step_lag_difference example #349

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 27, 2024

Conversation

dshemetov
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

Please:

  • Make sure this PR is against "dev", not "main".
  • Request a review from one of the current epipredict main reviewers:
    dajmcdon.
  • Make sure to bump the version number in DESCRIPTION and NEWS.md.
    Always increment the patch version number (the third number), unless you are
    making a release PR from dev to main, in which case increment the minor
    version number (the second number).
  • Describe changes made in NEWS.md, making sure breaking changes
    (backwards-incompatible changes to the documented interface) are noted.
    Collect the changes under the next release number (e.g. if you are on
    0.7.2, then write your changes under the 0.8 heading).
  • Consider pinning the epiprocess version in the DESCRIPTION file if
    • You anticipate breaking changes in epiprocess soon
    • You want to co-develop features in epipredict and epiprocess

Change explanations for reviewer

Adds step_epi_naomit to get rid of NAs.

Magic GitHub syntax to mark associated Issue(s) as resolved when this is merged into the default branch

@dshemetov dshemetov requested a review from dajmcdon as a code owner June 27, 2024 22:36
@dshemetov dshemetov merged commit 14e3708 into dev Jun 27, 2024
2 checks passed
@dshemetov dshemetov deleted the ds/step-lag-example branch June 27, 2024 23:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

step_lag_difference example should be a little clearer
2 participants