-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Get help for cmdlet #47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
corbob
wants to merge
3
commits into
coc-extensions:master
Choose a base branch
from
corbob:GetHelp
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+13
−5
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TylerLeonhardt or @yatli Was it intentional to get the lines instead of the selection? I was hoping to use getCurrentSelection for the Get-Help wrapper in that we could get the selected command, but we can't if we get the whole line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would you like to get the word under the cursor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well yes, but also in my mind getCurrentSelection would be to get the currently selected text when in VISUAL mode.
Given the line:
a selection of
Write-Host
would ideally return justWrite-Host
. As it is currently, it returns the entire line.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah unfortunately, @yatli had to hack the getCurrentSelection method to work (it works pretty well!). coc.nvim supplies a “get current selection” equivalent but I couldn’t get it to work and requires some work to get an idea for what’s going wrong:
neoclide/coc.nvim#933
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe, we should distinguish
mode
"v" from "V"There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From what I can tell there are effectively 3 Visual modes: V-LINE ("V"), V-BLOCK ("Ctrl+v"), and VISUAL ("v"). Should we distinguish between V-Block and normal Visual? I would think in V-Block mode, we'd want to get from start to end and possibly ignore that it's a block (for evaluation I can't think of a scenario where we would want to evaluate just the block).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Had a second thought and realized this:
Executing a part of something would be dangerous.
I wouldn't want someone to execute:
Line-based eval is good because it will never be a part of something (because of the line escape symbol
`
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes, so for evaluation then line based makes sense. Perhaps I'll either create a get-help specific one, or add a mode specific to Get-Help. As using Get-Help you'll not want the entire line, but just the selected command.