V8.4.0/migrate from cuemon #1
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive rebranding and restructuring of a .NET project, transitioning from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant SwaggerGenOptions
participant SwaggerUIOptions
User->>API: Sends request
API->>SwaggerGenOptions: Configures API documentation
SwaggerGenOptions->>SwaggerUIOptions: Sets up Swagger UI
SwaggerUIOptions->>User: Returns Swagger UI with API info
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
|
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
.docfx/PublishDocfxImage.ps1 (1)
2-2: LGTM!The updated Docker tag command aligns with the rebranding and restructuring objectives of the project. The use of a private registry (
jcr.codebelt.net) is a good practice for managing Docker images within the organization.Consider documenting the steps required for accessing the private registry, such as authentication and authorization, to ensure smooth adoption by the development team.
.docfx/index.md (1)
5-15: Great additions to the documentation!The added image, expanded content, and links provide valuable context and make the documentation more informative and user-friendly.
Consider adding a brief description of the project's key features or benefits to give users a quick overview of what they can expect from the library. This could be a bullet point list or a short paragraph highlighting the main advantages of using the Extensions for Swashbuckle.AspNetCore by Codebelt.
.docfx/api/namespaces/Cuemon.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.md (1)
14-18: Consider improving the table formatting for better readability.The table listing the extension methods is informative and easy to understand. However, you might consider aligning the column separators (
|) vertically to improve readability.Here's a suggested format:
|Type |Ext|Methods | |------------------|:-:|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |IServiceCollection|⬇️ |`AddRestfulSwagger` | |SwaggerGenOptions |⬇️ |`AddUserAgent`, `AddXApiKeySecurity`, `AddJwtBearerSecurity`, `AddBasicAuthenticationSecurity`| |XPathDocument |⬇️ |`AddByType`, `AddByAssembly`, `AddByFilename` |CHANGELOG.md (5)
7-8: Consider using a shorter alternative to "prior to".While the note provides useful context, you might consider using a shorter alternative to "prior to" for improved readability. For example:
- Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore. + Changelog entries before version 8.4.0 were migrated from previous versions of Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~8-~8: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...er.[!NOTE]
Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previou...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: The verb “was” doesn’t seem to fit in this context, “were” is probably more formally correct.
Context: ...hangelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Code...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_WAS_WERE)
12-12: Add a comma before "so".To improve the sentence structure and readability, please add a comma before "so" to connect the two independent clauses:
- This major release is first and foremost focused on ironing out any wrinkles that have been introduced with .NET 9 preview releases so the final release is production ready together with the official launch from Microsoft. + This major release is first and foremost focused on ironing out any wrinkles that have been introduced with .NET 9 preview releases, so the final release is production ready together with the official launch from Microsoft.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... introduced with .NET 9 preview releases so the final release is production ready t...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
18-18: Consider using a shorter alternative to "with respect to".While the update to the latest version of the dependency is relevant, you might consider using a shorter alternative to "with respect to" for improved readability. For example:
- Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs + Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore updated to latest and greatest for TFMsTools
LanguageTool
[style] ~18-~18: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...pNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs[8.3.2] - 2024-08-04
...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
24-24: Consider using a shorter alternative to "with respect to".While the update to the latest version of the dependency is relevant, you might consider using a shorter alternative to "with respect to" for improved readability. For example:
- Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs + Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore updated to latest and greatest for TFMsTools
LanguageTool
[style] ~24-~24: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...pNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs[8.3.1] - 2024-06-01
##...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
31-31: Consider using a shorter alternative to "with respect to".While the update to the latest version of the dependency is relevant, you might consider using a shorter alternative to "with respect to" for improved readability. For example:
- Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs + Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore updated to latest and greatest for TFMsTools
LanguageTool
[style] ~31-~31: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...pNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs[8.2.0] - 2024-03-03
##...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/RestfulSwaggerOptions.cs (1)
85-90: Consider usingValidator.ThrowIfNullfor null checks.Instead of using
Validator.ThrowIfInvalidState(propertyName == null), consider using the more specificValidator.ThrowIfNull(propertyName, nameof(propertyName))method for null checks. This will make the code more readable and provide better exception messages.Apply this diff to improve the
ValidateOptionsmethod:-Validator.ThrowIfInvalidState(OpenApiInfo == null); -Validator.ThrowIfInvalidState(XmlDocumentations == null); -Validator.ThrowIfInvalidState(Settings == null); +Validator.ThrowIfNull(OpenApiInfo, nameof(OpenApiInfo)); +Validator.ThrowIfNull(XmlDocumentations, nameof(XmlDocumentations)); +Validator.ThrowIfNull(Settings, nameof(Settings));src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs (4)
12-12: Update<seealso>tag to refer toIOperationFilterThe
<seealso>tag referencesIDocumentFilter, but this class implementsIOperationFilter. Please update the reference accordingly.Apply this diff to fix the
<seealso>tag:-/// <seealso cref="IDocumentFilter" /> +/// <seealso cref="IOperationFilter" />
39-39: Correct XML documentation to match the class nameThe XML documentation refers to
<see cref="DocumentFilter{T}"/>, but the class isOperationFilter<T>. Please update the reference to match the class name.Apply this diff to correct the documentation:
-/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="DocumentFilter{T}"/> class. +/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="OperationFilter{T}"/> class.
19-21: Add unit tests to cover the default constructorThe default constructor
protected OperationFilter()is not covered by unit tests. Consider adding tests to ensure the constructor behaves as expected.Would you like me to help generate unit tests for this constructor or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 19-21: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs#L19-L21
Added lines #L19 - L21 were not covered by tests
42-46: Add unit tests for the parameterized constructorThe constructor
protected OperationFilter(T options)is not covered by unit tests. Adding tests will ensure it correctly handles nulloptionsand properly sets theOptionsproperty.I can assist in writing unit tests to cover this constructor if you'd like.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 42-46: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs#L42-L46
Added lines #L42 - L46 were not covered by testssrc/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/ConfigureSwaggerGenOptions.cs (1)
24-27: Consider validating constructor parameters for null valuesTo enhance robustness, validate the constructor parameters to prevent potential null reference issues.
Add null checks in the constructor:
public ConfigureSwaggerGenOptions(IApiVersionDescriptionProvider provider, IOptions<RestfulSwaggerOptions> restfulSwaggerOptions) { + if (provider == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(provider)); + if (restfulSwaggerOptions == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(restfulSwaggerOptions)); _provider = provider; }src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs (1)
34-62: Add unit tests for new security methodsStatic analysis indicates that the newly added security methods (
AddXApiKeySecurity,AddJwtBearerSecurity, andAddBasicAuthenticationSecurity) lack unit test coverage. Adding tests for these methods will help ensure they function as intended and prevent future regressions.Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for these methods or should we open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Also applies to: 71-99, 108-135
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 34-42: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs#L34-L42
Added lines #L34 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 44-58: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs#L44-L58
Added lines #L44 - L58 were not covered by tests
[warning] 60-62: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs#L60-L62
Added lines #L60 - L62 were not covered by teststest/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (2)
29-47: Rename variable 'filter' to 'webHost' for clarityThe variable
filteris used to host the test server but may not clearly convey its purpose. Renaming it towebHostwould enhance readability and better represent its function.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
-using (var filter = WebHostTestFactory.Create(services => +using (var webHost = WebHostTestFactory.Create(services => ... - var client = filter.Host.GetTestClient(); + var client = webHost.Host.GetTestClient();
137-174: Rename variable 'filter' to 'webHost' for clarityThe variable
filteris used again in this test to represent the test server. Renaming it towebHostortestHostwould improve code readability.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
-using (var filter = WebHostTestFactory.Create(services => +using (var webHost = WebHostTestFactory.Create(services => ... - var client = filter.Host.GetTestClient(); + var client = webHost.Host.GetTestClient();
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (45)
- .docfx/BuildDocfxImage.ps1 (1 hunks)
- .docfx/PublishDocfxImage.ps1 (1 hunks)
- .docfx/api/namespaces/ClassLibrary1.md (0 hunks)
- .docfx/api/namespaces/Cuemon.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.md (1 hunks)
- .docfx/docfx.json (2 hunks)
- .docfx/index.md (1 hunks)
- .docfx/packages/index.md (1 hunks)
- .docfx/toc.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/CONTRIBUTING.md (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (5 hunks)
- .nuget/ClassLibrary1/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (0 hunks)
- .nuget/ClassLibrary1/README.md (0 hunks)
- .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
- .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/README.md (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- ClassLibrary1.sln (0 hunks)
- Codebelt..Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.sln (1 hunks)
- Directory.Build.props (3 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/ClassLibrary1/Class1.cs (0 hunks)
- src/ClassLibrary1/ClassLibrary1.csproj (0 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/ConfigureSwaggerGenOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/ConfigureSwaggerUIOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/DocumentFilter.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/GlobalSuppressions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OpenApiInfoOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/RestfulSwaggerOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/UserAgentDocumentFilter.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/UserAgentDocumentOptions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/XPathDocumentExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/V1/FakeController.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/V2/FakeController.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/RestfulSwaggerOptionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/TestProject1.FunctionalTests/Class1Test.cs (0 hunks)
- test/TestProject1.FunctionalTests/TestProject1.FunctionalTests.csproj (0 hunks)
- test/TestProject1/Class1Test.cs (0 hunks)
- test/TestProject1/TestProject1.Tests.csproj (0 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (10)
- .docfx/api/namespaces/ClassLibrary1.md
- .nuget/ClassLibrary1/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
- .nuget/ClassLibrary1/README.md
- ClassLibrary1.sln
- src/ClassLibrary1/Class1.cs
- src/ClassLibrary1/ClassLibrary1.csproj
- test/TestProject1.FunctionalTests/Class1Test.cs
- test/TestProject1.FunctionalTests/TestProject1.FunctionalTests.csproj
- test/TestProject1/Class1Test.cs
- test/TestProject1/TestProject1.Tests.csproj
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/CONTRIBUTING.md
- Codebelt..Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.sln
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
Additional context used
LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~8-~8: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...er.[!NOTE]
Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previou...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: The verb “was” doesn’t seem to fit in this context, “were” is probably more formally correct.
Context: ...hangelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Code...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_WAS_WERE)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... introduced with .NET 9 preview releases so the final release is production ready t...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
[style] ~18-~18: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...pNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs[8.3.2] - 2024-08-04
...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
[style] ~24-~24: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...pNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs[8.3.1] - 2024-06-01
##...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
[style] ~31-~31: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...pNetCore updated to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs[8.2.0] - 2024-03-03
##...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
README.md
[style] ~15-~15: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1942 characters long)
Context: ...ns.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore?logo=nuget) | 
Markdownlint
README.md
9-9: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs
[warning] 19-21: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs#L19-L21
Added lines #L19 - L21 were not covered by tests
[warning] 42-46: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs#L42-L46
Added lines #L42 - L46 were not covered by tests
[warning] 52-52: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OperationFilter.cs#L52
Added line #L52 was not covered by testssrc/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs
[warning] 34-42: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs#L34-L42
Added lines #L34 - L42 were not covered by tests
[warning] 44-58: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs#L44-L58
Added lines #L44 - L58 were not covered by tests
[warning] 60-62: src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensions.cs#L60-L62
Added lines #L60 - L62 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (72)
.docfx/toc.yml (1)
1-2: LGTM!The changes to the name and link of the API documentation entry in the table of contents are consistent with the rebranding and restructuring objectives of the PR. The new name "Swashbuckle.AspNetCore API" and link
api/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.htmlaccurately reflect the migration from "ClassLibrary1" to "Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore".The changes are localized and not expected to have any negative impact on the documentation site's functionality.
.docfx/PublishDocfxImage.ps1 (1)
3-3: Looks good!The updated Docker push command is consistent with the new target repository and aligns with the rebranding and restructuring objectives of the project.
.docfx/BuildDocfxImage.ps1 (1)
3-3: LGTM!The updated Docker image tag aligns with the rebranding and restructuring of the project. The use of
buildxfor multi-platform builds and the--loadflag for loading the image into the local Docker daemon are good practices. The changes will not negatively impact the script or the built image.test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/V1/FakeController.cs (1)
8-19: LGTM!The
FakeControllerclass is a well-structured and appropriately named controller for unit testing purposes. The class and method attributes are correctly applied, and the method implementation is straightforward and suitable for testing.The class is located in the correct namespace for the V1 version of the API and does not impact any existing code.
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests.csproj (2)
1-16: LGTM!The test project file is well-structured and follows the standard conventions for a .NET test project. The root namespace is consistent with the project name and the overall rebranding effort. The project reference to
Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCoreis correctly set up.
9-9: Consider updating the package reference to reflect the new branding.The package reference to
Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Jsonmight need to be updated to reflect the new branding, if applicable. Please verify if there is a corresponding package under the newCodebeltnamespace and update the reference accordingly.Run the following script to check if there is a corresponding package under the new
Codebeltnamespace:test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/Assets/V2/FakeController.cs (1)
6-8: LGTM!The class attributes are correctly specified, indicating that the controller produces JSON responses, is an API controller, and defines a route template for the controller's actions.
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/GlobalSuppressions.cs (2)
1-5: LGTM!The comment block provides a clear and accurate explanation of the purpose of the
GlobalSuppressions.csfile and how it is used by Code Analysis. The comment adheres to the standard format for multi-line comments in C#.
6-8: LGTM!The
SuppressMessageattribute is correctly applied at the assembly level to suppress a specific security warning. The justification provided for the suppression seems reasonable, considering that XML documentation files may have different security considerations compared to other XML files. The suppression is properly scoped to a specific member, indicating a targeted suppression..docfx/index.md (2)
3-3: LGTM!The updated title accurately reflects the rebranding and provides a clear description of the project.
1-2: LGTM!The YAML front matter and the
uidproperty are correctly defined for the markdown document.src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.csproj (3)
3-6: LGTM!The property group is correctly defined with a unique project GUID and an optional flag to disable OpenAPI document generation.
8-11: LGTM!The property group provides a clear description of the project and includes relevant package tags for discoverability on NuGet.
13-16: LGTM!The item group correctly specifies the required package references for the project, with the
Codebelt.Extensions.Asp.Versioningpackage at the expected version 8.4.0 and theSwashbuckle.AspNetCorepackage at a stable version 6.7.3..docfx/packages/index.md (3)
3-3: LGTM!The updated introductory text accurately reflects the rebranding of the project to "Extensions for Swashbuckle.AspNetCore API by Codebelt".
5-5: LGTM!The updated section header for standalone packages correctly reflects the new hierarchy in the document structure.
7-7: LGTM!The standalone package has been correctly updated to reflect the new package name "Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore". The package description, links, and badge images have also been updated accordingly.
Also applies to: 11-11
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/README.md (1)
1-13: LGTM!The README provides a clear and concise introduction to the
Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCoreproject. It effectively communicates the project's purpose, scope, and where to find more detailed documentation.The content is well-structured and easy to understand, making it a good entry point for developers interested in using or contributing to the project.
.docfx/api/namespaces/Cuemon.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.md (1)
1-18: Excellent documentation for the new namespace!The markdown file provides a clear and concise overview of the
Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCorenamespace. The summary effectively communicates the purpose and functionality of the namespace, and the table listing the extension methods is informative and well-structured.The inclusion of related resources and complementary libraries is a nice touch, as it helps developers understand how this namespace fits into the broader ecosystem.
Overall, this file aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of rebranding and restructuring the project. Great work!
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/OpenApiInfoOptions.cs (1)
11-42: LGTM!The
OpenApiInfoOptionsclass is well-designed and documented. It encapsulates the necessary properties to define and configure the metadata for an Open API specification. The properties are appropriately named and typed to represent the metadata fields of an Open API Info Object. TheExtensionsproperty is correctly initialized as an empty dictionary to allow for the inclusion of Specification Extensions.src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/ConfigureSwaggerUIOptions.cs (1)
1-39: Excellent implementation ofConfigureSwaggerUIOptionsclass!The
ConfigureSwaggerUIOptionsclass provides a clean and effective way to dynamically configure the Swagger UI based on the available API versions in the application. Here are some key points:
- The class implements the
IConfigureOptions<SwaggerUIOptions>interface, allowing it to configure instances ofSwaggerUIOptions.- The constructor takes an
IApiVersionDescriptionProvideras a dependency, which is used to retrieve the API version descriptions. This approach promotes loose coupling and extensibility.- The
Configuremethod iterates over the API version descriptions, extracts the group names, and adds corresponding Swagger endpoints to theSwaggerUIOptions. This ensures that the Swagger UI displays the correct endpoints and documentation for each API version.- The Swagger endpoint URL format
/swagger/{groupName}/swagger.jsonand the uppercase display name provide a consistent and readable structure.Overall, this implementation enhances the Swagger UI configuration process by dynamically adapting to the available API versions, improving the developer experience and documentation accuracy.
.docfx/docfx.json (5)
7-7: LGTM!The change to the project source path aligns with the rebranding of the project and ensures that the correct project files are used as the source for generating documentation.
47-47: LGTM!The change to the
_appTitleglobal metadata property aligns with the rebranding of the project and ensures that the generated documentation has the correct title.
51-51: LGTM!The change to the
_googleAnalyticsTagIdglobal metadata property ensures that the generated documentation is tracked using the correct Google Analytics account.
55-55: LGTM!The change to the
_gitContribute.repoglobal metadata property ensures that the "Edit this page" links in the generated documentation point to the correct GitHub repository.
Line range hint
21-23: LGTM!The removal of unnecessary xref map URLs simplifies the DocFX configuration and reduces the number of external dependencies.
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (7)
1-6: LGTM!Updating dependencies to the latest versions compatible with the target frameworks is a good practice for package maintenance. The changes look good.
7-12: Please provide more context on the removal of .NET 7 support.The release notes mention removing support for .NET 7 but do not provide a rationale for this change. Removing support for a target framework is a significant change that could impact users of the package.
Please provide more information on the following:
- What is the reason for removing .NET 7 support?
- How does this change impact existing users of the package who are targeting .NET 7?
- Are there any migration steps or alternatives for users who are affected by this change?
Providing this additional context will help users understand the change and plan accordingly.
14-18: LGTM!Updating dependencies to the latest versions compatible with the target frameworks is a good practice for package maintenance. The changes look good.
20-31: The new features and improvements in this version look great!The release notes provide a clear overview of the changes in this version:
The new
AddBasicAuthenticationSecurityextension method inSwaggerGenOptionsExtensionsadds a convenient way to configure basic authentication security in Swagger.The changes to
RestfulSwaggerOptionsandServiceCollectionExtensionsto supportJsonSerializerOptionsFactoryimprove flexibility in resolvingJsonSerializerOptionsinstances, which is a nice enhancement over the default Swagger functionality.These additions and enhancements make the package more feature-rich and customizable. Great work!
33-37: LGTM!Updating dependencies to the latest versions compatible with the target frameworks is a good practice for package maintenance. The changes look good.
39-43: LGTM!Updating dependencies to the latest versions compatible with the target frameworks is a good practice for package maintenance. The changes look good.
45-52: Complying with code analysis rules is a great practice!The release notes mention updating the
SwaggerGenOptionsExtensionsclass to comply with the code analysis rule CA1825, which relates to the usage ofConfigureAwait.Adhering to code analysis rules helps improve code quality, maintainability, and performance. It's great to see this being prioritized in the package.
Keep up the good work in ensuring compliance with code analysis rules and best practices!
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/DocumentFilter.cs (2)
8-29: LGTM!The
DocumentFilterabstract class provides a solid foundation for creating custom document filters. It correctly implements theIDocumentFilterinterface and includes an abstractApplymethod for derived classes to define the document modification logic. The XML documentation comments provide clear guidance on the class's purpose and usage.
31-52: LGTM!The
DocumentFilter<T>abstract class extends the functionality ofDocumentFilterby adding configurability through a generic type parameterT. The constructor correctly enforces the requirement of providing non-null options, and the read-onlyOptionsproperty allows access to the configured options. The XML documentation comments provide clear guidance on the class's purpose and usage.README.md (4)
1-1: LGTM!The image tag is used appropriately to display the project logo or icon. The alt text provides a good description of the image, which is important for accessibility. The image source points to a file within the repository, which is the correct approach.
3-7: LGTM!The project title and description accurately reflect the purpose and scope of the project. The badges provide useful information about the project's health and quality, which can help potential contributors and users assess the project.
17-18: LGTM!The heading and description provide useful information for potential contributors, encouraging them to submit issues, feature requests, or pull requests to help improve the library. The link to the contribution guidelines is helpful for potential contributors to understand the process and expectations for contributing to the project.
15-15: Remove the exclamation marks from the badges.The excessive use of exclamation marks in the badges might seem excessive and unprofessional. Please remove them to improve the readability and professionalism of the README.
Apply this diff to remove the exclamation marks from the badges:
-| [Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/) |  |  |  | +| [Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/) | [vNext](https://img.shields.io/nuget/vpre/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore?logo=nuget) | [Stable](https://img.shields.io/nuget/v/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore?logo=nuget) | [Downloads](https://img.shields.io/nuget/dt/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore?color=blueviolet&logo=nuget) |Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~15-~15: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1942 characters long)
Context: ...ns.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore?logo=nuget) | 
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/UserAgentDocumentOptions.cs (1)
1-59: LGTM!The
UserAgentDocumentOptionsclass is well-designed and follows best practices:
- The class is well-documented with XML comments that provide a clear understanding of its purpose and usage.
- The constructor initializes the properties with sensible default values.
- The properties are simple getters and setters with no additional logic, which is appropriate for a configuration class.
- The class adheres to the Single Responsibility Principle by focusing solely on providing configuration options for the
UserAgentDocumentFilterclass.- The class is named appropriately and follows the naming conventions for C# classes.
- The class is located in the appropriate namespace.
Great job!
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/UserAgentDocumentFilter.cs (3)
7-56: LGTM!The
UserAgentDocumentFilterclass is well-designed and follows the Swashbuckle conventions for implementing a customDocumentFilter. The class and its members are properly documented with XML comments, making it easy to understand its purpose and usage.The constructor takes an instance of
UserAgentDocumentOptionsto configure the User-Agent parameter, and theApplymethod correctly modifies theOpenApiDocumentby adding the User-Agent parameter and referencing it in all operations.Overall, the class is a great addition to the project and enhances the generated OpenAPI documentation by including the User-Agent header parameter.
21-23: LGTM!The constructor is properly implemented and follows the expected pattern for a class that extends
DocumentFilter<T>. It takes an instance ofUserAgentDocumentOptionsas a parameter to configure the User-Agent parameter and passes it to the base class constructor.The constructor is also well-documented with XML comments explaining its parameters.
31-54: LGTM!The
Applymethod is properly implemented and follows the expected behavior for a customDocumentFilter. It correctly modifies theOpenApiDocumentby adding the User-Agent parameter to theComponents.Parameterscollection with the appropriate properties based on the providedUserAgentDocumentOptions.The method also ensures that the User-Agent parameter is referenced in all operations by iterating through the document's paths and inserting a reference to the parameter at the beginning of each operation's parameters list.
The method is well-documented with XML comments explaining its parameters and behavior, making it easy to understand its purpose and functionality.
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (1)
21-46: Excellent work on theAddRestfulSwaggerextension method!The method provides a clean and convenient way to configure Swagger for RESTful APIs with sensible defaults and customization options. It encapsulates the configuration logic and reduces the boilerplate code required in the startup class, making it easier to set up Swagger in a consistent manner across projects.
Some key benefits of the method:
It validates the provided configuration using
Validator.ThrowIfInvalidConfigurator, ensuring that the setup action is valid and preventing potential runtime errors.It configures multiple filter descriptors and options based on the provided
RestfulSwaggerOptions, allowing for fine-grained control over the Swagger generation process.It registers transient services for configuring
SwaggerGenOptionsandSwaggerUIOptions, enabling flexible customization of Swagger generation and UI options.If a JSON serializer options factory is provided, it registers a transient service for
ISerializerDataContractResolver, facilitating the use of custom JSON serialization settings.It follows the fluent interface pattern by returning the modified
IServiceCollection, allowing for chaining of service registrations.Overall, the method is well-structured, follows best practices, and provides a valuable addition to the project's Swagger configuration capabilities.
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/XPathDocumentExtensions.cs (3)
21-25: LGTM!The method is well-documented, follows a fluent API design, and includes appropriate input validation. The logic is correct and the implementation is clean.
33-39: LGTM!The method is well-documented, follows a fluent API design, and includes appropriate input validation. The logic for handling dynamic assemblies and constructing the XML documentation file path is correct. The implementation is clean and follows common conventions.
47-56: LGTM!The method is well-documented and includes appropriate input validation. The logic for checking if the file exists and creating an
XPathDocumentfrom the file path is correct. The implementation is clean and follows best practices.test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/RestfulSwaggerOptionsTest.cs (4)
15-28: LGTM!The test method correctly verifies the behavior when
OpenApiInfoproperty is set to null. It covers the necessary scenarios and assertions.
30-43: LGTM!The test method correctly verifies the behavior when
XmlDocumentationsproperty is set to null. It covers the necessary scenarios and assertions.
45-58: LGTM!The test method correctly verifies the behavior when
Settingsproperty is set to null. It covers the necessary scenarios and assertions.
60-69: LGTM!The test method correctly verifies that a new instance of
RestfulSwaggerOptionshas the expected default values. It covers the necessary scenarios and assertions.Directory.Build.props (10)
7-7: LGTM!The
IsMainAuthorproperty condition has been correctly updated to reflect the new email address as part of the project migration.
18-18: LGTM!The
TargetFrameworksproperty has been correctly updated to include bothnet8.0andnet6.0, expanding the project's compatibility with different .NET versions.
19-22: LGTM!The
Copyright,Authors,Company, andProductproperties have been correctly updated to reflect the new project identity as part of the migration.
25-25: LGTM!The
PackageProjectUrlproperty has been correctly updated to reflect the new project URL.
27-27: LGTM!The
RepositoryUrlproperty has been correctly updated to reflect the new project repository location on GitHub.
36-36: LGTM!The
AssemblyOriginatorKeyFileproperty has been correctly updated to reference the newswashbuckle.snkkey file as part of the project migration.
41-41: LGTM!The
SourceRootitem has been correctly updated with the new project repository URL on GitHub.
47-47: LGTM!The
Noneitem foricon.pnghas been correctly updated to remove the project name from the file path.
52-52: LGTM!The
TargetFrameworksproperty for test projects on Linux has been correctly updated to include bothnet8.0andnet6.0, expanding the test projects' compatibility with different .NET versions on Linux.
56-56: LGTM!The
TargetFrameworksproperty for test projects on Windows has been correctly updated to include bothnet8.0andnet6.0, expanding the test projects' compatibility with different .NET versions on Windows.src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/RestfulSwaggerOptions.cs (1)
11-92: TheRestfulSwaggerOptionsclass is well-designed and implemented.The class provides a clean and structured way to configure Swagger options programmatically. The properties are well-named and cover the essential aspects of Swagger configuration. The constructor sets sensible defaults, and the
ValidateOptionsmethod ensures the required properties are not null.The class is also well-documented with XML comments, making it easy to understand and use.
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (5)
1-1: LGTM!The pipeline name has been appropriately updated to reflect the project rebranding.
29-29: LGTM!The expanded framework matrix enhances the pipeline's compatibility and testing coverage by including both
net8.0andnet6.0.
48-53: LGTM!The signing key file name has been appropriately updated to
swashbuckle.snk, reflecting the change in the artifact being used for signing.
138-138: LGTM!The SonarCloud project key has been appropriately updated to
swashbuckle-aspnetcore, aligning with the new project name.
165-165: LGTM!The Codecov repository has been appropriately updated to
codebeltnet/swashbuckle-aspnetcore, reflecting the new project context.test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/SwaggerGenOptionsExtensionsTest.cs (3)
22-91: LGTM!The test method is well-structured, follows the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern, and has a descriptive name. The test server setup is comprehensive, and the expected JSON is clearly defined and compared against the actual result.
93-162: LGTM!The test method follows a similar structure to the first test, maintaining consistency. The test server setup is identical, ensuring a consistent testing environment. The expected JSON includes the JWT Bearer security scheme definition, and the test method name is descriptive.
164-232: LGTM!The test method maintains consistency with the previous tests in terms of structure and setup. The expected JSON includes the Basic authentication security scheme definition, and the test method name is descriptive.
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/ConfigureSwaggerGenOptions.cs (1)
35-54: Verify that XML documentation files are correctly referencedThe code includes XML comments from
Options.XmlDocumentations. Ensure that the file paths are correct and the files exist to prevent errors during the Swagger generation.Run the following script to list the XML documentation files and check their existence:
Verification successful
XML documentation is dynamically loaded, no static files to verify
After analyzing the codebase, it appears that the XML documentation files are not static files in the project, but are dynamically generated or loaded at runtime. The
XmlDocumentationsproperty likely containsXPathDocumentobjects rather than file paths. This approach is correct and doesn't require verification of static XML files.Key observations:
- No XML files were found in the project directory structure.
- Code in
XPathDocumentExtensions.cssuggests XML files are generated with the same name as the assembly but with a .xml extension.- Multiple references to
XmlDocumentationswere found across different files, indicating its usage throughout the project.Recommendation:
- Review the code that loads the XML documentation to ensure proper error handling in case of missing or invalid XML data.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify XML documentation files specified in RestfulSwaggerOptions # Test: List the XML files. Expect: Files exist and paths are correct. for xmldoc in "${Options.XmlDocumentations[@]}"; do if [ -f "$xmldoc" ]; then echo "Found XML documentation: $xmldoc" else echo "Missing XML documentation: $xmldoc" fi doneLength of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find RestfulSwaggerOptions class definition echo "Searching for RestfulSwaggerOptions class definition:" ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class RestfulSwaggerOptions { $$$ }' # Search for XML file references in the codebase echo -e "\nSearching for XML file references:" rg -i "\.xml" --type csharp # Find all XML files in the project echo -e "\nListing all XML files in the project:" fd -e xml # Check if any XML files are in a 'bin' or 'obj' directory echo -e "\nChecking for XML files in 'bin' or 'obj' directories:" fd -e xml | grep -E '(bin|obj)'Length of output: 2014
test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs (1)
164-165: Verify the compatibility of 'AddByType' and 'JsonFormatterOptions' with 'Codebelt'The usage of
AddByTypeandJsonFormatterOptionsmay still reference components from theCuemonlibrary. Ensure these are available inCodebeltor replace them with appropriate alternatives.Run the following script to check for references to
AddByTypeandJsonFormatterOptionswithin theCodebeltextensions:Verification successful
'AddByType' is Codebelt-compatible, 'JsonFormatterOptions' is from Cuemon
The verification process has revealed the following:
- 'AddByType' is correctly implemented in the Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore library and is compatible with the Codebelt ecosystem.
- 'JsonFormatterOptions' is not part of Codebelt but comes from the Cuemon library, specifically the 'Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json' package.
The usage of Cuemon's JsonFormatterOptions in the test file is intentional and doesn't affect the main Codebelt library. However, it's recommended to review the test dependencies to ensure they align with the intended usage and testing strategy for the Codebelt library.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'AddByType' and 'JsonFormatterOptions' are part of 'Codebelt.Extensions' # Test: Search for 'AddByType' method in Codebelt.Extensions rg --type cs 'AddByType' --context 3 'Codebelt.Extensions/' # Test: Search for 'JsonFormatterOptions' type in Codebelt.Extensions rg --type cs 'JsonFormatterOptions' --context 3 'Codebelt.Extensions/'Length of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and context of 'AddByType' and 'JsonFormatterOptions' # List directory structure echo "Directory structure:" fd -t d -d 2 # Search for 'AddByType' in the entire codebase echo -e "\nSearching for 'AddByType':" rg --type cs 'AddByType' -C 3 # Search for 'JsonFormatterOptions' in the entire codebase echo -e "\nSearching for 'JsonFormatterOptions':" rg --type cs 'JsonFormatterOptions' -C 3Length of output: 4010
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of 'AddByType' and search for 'JsonFormatterOptions' definition # Check the implementation of 'AddByType' echo "Implementation of AddByType:" rg --type cs -A 10 'public static IList<XPathDocument> AddByType' src/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore/XPathDocumentExtensions.cs # Search for 'JsonFormatterOptions' definition or import echo -e "\nSearching for JsonFormatterOptions definition or import:" rg --type cs 'class JsonFormatterOptions|using.*JsonFormatterOptions'Length of output: 979
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate the origin of 'JsonFormatterOptions' # Search for 'using' statements in the test file echo "Searching for 'using' statements in ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs:" rg --type cs '^using' test/Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Tests/ServiceCollectionExtensionsTest.cs # Search for references to external libraries or NuGet packages echo -e "\nSearching for .csproj files and their contents:" fd -e csproj | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo "File: {}"; cat {} | grep -i "packagereference\|projectreference"' # Search for 'JsonFormatterOptions' in the entire codebase with more context echo -e "\nSearching for 'JsonFormatterOptions' with more context:" rg --type cs 'JsonFormatterOptions' -C 5Length of output: 3792
| /// </summary> | ||
| /// <returns>IActionResult.</returns> | ||
| [HttpGet] | ||
| public IActionResult Get(FaultSensitivityDetails details) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the unused parameter.
The FaultSensitivityDetails parameter is not used in the method implementation. Consider removing it to avoid confusion and potential bugs.
Apply this diff to remove the unused parameter:
-public IActionResult Get(FaultSensitivityDetails details)
+public IActionResult Get()Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public IActionResult Get(FaultSensitivityDetails details) | |
| public IActionResult Get() |
| ### 📦 Standalone Packages | ||
|
|
||
| |Package|vNext|Stable|Downloads| | ||
| |:--|:-:|:-:|:-:| | ||
| | [ClassLibrary1](https://www.nuget.org/packages/ClassLibrary1/) |  |  |  | | ||
|
|
||
| ## 🏭 Productivity Packages | ||
|
|
||
| Provides a convenient set of default API additions for ... | ||
| Provides a focused API for RESTful versioning. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the heading level.
The heading "Standalone Packages" should be an h2 instead of an h3 to maintain a consistent hierarchy with the other headings in the file.
Apply this diff to fix the heading level:
-### 📦 Standalone Packages
+## 📦 Standalone PackagesCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ### 📦 Standalone Packages | |
| |Package|vNext|Stable|Downloads| | |
| |:--|:-:|:-:|:-:| | |
| | [ClassLibrary1](https://www.nuget.org/packages/ClassLibrary1/) |  |  |  | | |
| ## 🏭 Productivity Packages | |
| Provides a convenient set of default API additions for ... | |
| Provides a focused API for RESTful versioning. | |
| ## 📦 Standalone Packages | |
| Provides a focused API for RESTful versioning. |
Tools
Markdownlint
9-9: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
|
|
||
| ## [Unreleased] - TBD | ||
| > [!NOTE] | ||
| > Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the grammatical error.
The verb "was" doesn't agree with the plural subject "entries". Please change it to "were":
- Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.
+ Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 were migrated from previous versions of Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| > Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore. | |
| > Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 were migrated from previous versions of Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore. |
Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~8-~8: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...er.[!NOTE]
Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previou...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: The verb “was” doesn’t seem to fit in this context, “were” is probably more formally correct.
Context: ...hangelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previous versions of Code...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CPT_WAS_WERE)
| using Cuemon; | ||
| using Cuemon.Configuration; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace Cuemon namespaces with Codebelt equivalents
The file is still using Cuemon namespaces (Cuemon and Cuemon.Configuration) after migrating to Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore. Please update these to the appropriate Codebelt namespaces to reflect the migration.
Apply this diff to replace the namespaces:
-using Cuemon;
-using Cuemon.Configuration;
+using Codebelt;
+using Codebelt.Configuration;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using Cuemon; | |
| using Cuemon.Configuration; | |
| using Codebelt; | |
| using Codebelt.Configuration; |
| /// <param name="options">The configured options of this instance.</param> | ||
| protected OperationFilter(T options) | ||
| { | ||
| Validator.ThrowIfNull(options); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace Validator.ThrowIfNull with an appropriate null check
The method Validator.ThrowIfNull(options); depends on Validator from Cuemon, which you're migrating away from. Consider using a standard null check or an equivalent method from Codebelt.
Apply this diff to replace with a standard null check:
-Validator.ThrowIfNull(options);
+if (options == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(options));Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Validator.ThrowIfNull(options); | |
| if (options == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(options)); |
| options.AddSecurityDefinition(HttpAuthenticationSchemes.Basic, new OpenApiSecurityScheme | ||
| { | ||
| Description = $"Protects an API by adding an {HttpHeaderNames.Authorization} header using the {HttpAuthenticationSchemes.Basic} scheme.", | ||
| Name = HttpHeaderNames.Authorization, | ||
| In = ParameterLocation.Header, | ||
| Type = SecuritySchemeType.Http, | ||
| Scheme = HttpAuthenticationSchemes.Basic.ToLowerInvariant() | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace Cuemon authentication scheme constants
Similarly, in the AddBasicAuthenticationSecurity method, HttpAuthenticationSchemes.Basic is likely from Cuemon. Replace it with an appropriate alternative to remove dependency on Cuemon.
You might replace HttpAuthenticationSchemes.Basic with "Basic" directly, or define your own constants.
| using System; | ||
| using Cuemon; | ||
| using Cuemon.Net.Http; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update using directives to reflect migration
The using statements on lines 2 and 3 are still referencing Cuemon namespaces (Cuemon and Cuemon.Net.Http). Since the project is migrating from Cuemon to Codebelt, these should be updated to the corresponding Codebelt namespaces.
Apply this diff to update the namespaces:
-using Cuemon;
-using Cuemon.Net.Http;
+using Codebelt;
+using Codebelt.Net.Http;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using System; | |
| using Cuemon; | |
| using Cuemon.Net.Http; | |
| using System; | |
| using Codebelt; | |
| using Codebelt.Net.Http; |
| using Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json; | ||
| using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update namespace references from 'Cuemon' to 'Codebelt'
The using directives on lines 8-9 still reference the Cuemon namespaces:
using Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json;using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters;
Since the project is migrating from Cuemon to Codebelt, these should be updated to the corresponding Codebelt namespaces to reflect the rebranding and ensure consistency.
Apply this diff to update the namespace references:
-using Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json;
-using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters;
+using Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json;
+using Codebelt.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json; | |
| using Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters; | |
| using Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Json; | |
| using Codebelt.Extensions.Text.Json.Formatters; |
| var result = await client.GetStringAsync("/swagger/v1/swagger.json"); | ||
|
|
||
| TestOutput.WriteLine(result); | ||
|
|
||
| Assert.Equal(@"{ | ||
| ""openapi"": ""3.0.1"", | ||
| ""info"": { | ||
| ""title"": ""API 1.0"", | ||
| ""version"": ""1.0"" | ||
| }, | ||
| ""paths"": { | ||
| ""/Fake"": { | ||
| ""get"": { | ||
| ""tags"": [ | ||
| ""Fake"" | ||
| ], | ||
| ""responses"": { | ||
| ""200"": { | ||
| ""description"": ""OK"" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| ""components"": { } | ||
| }", result, ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance test robustness by comparing deserialized JSON objects
Asserting equality on raw JSON strings can be brittle due to potential differences in formatting or property ordering. Consider deserializing both the expected and actual JSON strings into objects and then comparing them. This approach improves test robustness and maintainability.
Apply this diff to refactor the assertion:
-Assert.Equal(@"{
- ""openapi"": ""3.0.1"",
- ""info"": {
- ""title"": ""API 1.0"",
- ""version"": ""1.0""
- },
- ""paths"": {
- ""/Fake"": {
- ""get"": {
- ""tags"": [
- ""Fake""
- ],
- ""responses"": {
- ""200"": {
- ""description"": ""OK""
- }
- }
- }
- }
- },
- ""components"": { }
-}", result, ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true);
+var expected = new
+{
+ openapi = "3.0.1",
+ info = new { title = "API 1.0", version = "1.0" },
+ paths = new
+ {
+ ["/Fake"] = new
+ {
+ get = new
+ {
+ tags = new[] { "Fake" },
+ responses = new { _200 = new { description = "OK" } }
+ }
+ }
+ },
+ components = new { }
+};
+
+var actual = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<JsonElement>(result);
+var expectedJson = JsonSerializer.Serialize(expected);
+Assert.Equal(expectedJson, actual.GetRawText(), ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| var result = await client.GetStringAsync("/swagger/v1/swagger.json"); | |
| TestOutput.WriteLine(result); | |
| Assert.Equal(@"{ | |
| ""openapi"": ""3.0.1"", | |
| ""info"": { | |
| ""title"": ""API 1.0"", | |
| ""version"": ""1.0"" | |
| }, | |
| ""paths"": { | |
| ""/Fake"": { | |
| ""get"": { | |
| ""tags"": [ | |
| ""Fake"" | |
| ], | |
| ""responses"": { | |
| ""200"": { | |
| ""description"": ""OK"" | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| ""components"": { } | |
| }", result, ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true); | |
| var result = await client.GetStringAsync("/swagger/v1/swagger.json"); | |
| TestOutput.WriteLine(result); | |
| var expected = new | |
| { | |
| openapi = "3.0.1", | |
| info = new { title = "API 1.0", version = "1.0" }, | |
| paths = new | |
| { | |
| ["/Fake"] = new | |
| { | |
| get = new | |
| { | |
| tags = new[] { "Fake" }, | |
| responses = new { _200 = new { description = "OK" } } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| components = new { } | |
| }; | |
| var actual = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<JsonElement>(result); | |
| var expectedJson = JsonSerializer.Serialize(expected); | |
| Assert.Equal(expectedJson, actual.GetRawText(), ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true); |
| Assert.Equal(@"{ | ||
| ""openapi"": ""3.0.1"", | ||
| ""info"": { | ||
| ""title"": ""API 2.0"", | ||
| ""version"": ""2.0"" | ||
| }, | ||
| ""paths"": { | ||
| ""/Fake"": { | ||
| ""get"": { | ||
| ""tags"": [ | ||
| ""Fake"" | ||
| ], | ||
| ""parameters"": [ | ||
| { | ||
| ""name"": ""details"", | ||
| ""in"": ""query"", | ||
| ""schema"": { | ||
| ""$ref"": ""#/components/schemas/FaultSensitivityDetails"" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| ""responses"": { | ||
| ""200"": { | ||
| ""description"": ""OK"" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| ""components"": { | ||
| ""schemas"": { | ||
| ""FaultSensitivityDetails"": { | ||
| ""enum"": [ | ||
| 0, | ||
| 1, | ||
| 2, | ||
| 3, | ||
| 4, | ||
| 5, | ||
| 7, | ||
| 8, | ||
| 15 | ||
| ], | ||
| ""type"": ""integer"", | ||
| ""format"": ""int32"" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }", result, ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance test robustness by comparing deserialized JSON objects
Similar to the previous suggestion, refactor the assertion to compare deserialized JSON objects to improve test reliability.
Apply this diff to refactor the assertion:
-Assert.Equal(@"{
- ""openapi"": ""3.0.1"",
- ""info"": {
- ""title"": ""API 2.0"",
- ""version"": ""2.0""
- },
- ""paths"": {
- ""/Fake"": {
- ""get"": {
- ""tags"": [
- ""Fake""
- ],
- ""parameters"": [
- {
- ""name"": ""details"",
- ""in"": ""query"",
- ""schema"": {
- ""$ref"": ""#/components/schemas/FaultSensitivityDetails""
- }
- }
- ],
- ""responses"": {
- ""200"": {
- ""description"": ""OK""
- }
- }
- }
- }
- },
- ""components"": {
- ""schemas"": {
- ""FaultSensitivityDetails"": {
- ""enum"": [
- 0,
- 1,
- 2,
- 3,
- 4,
- 5,
- 7,
- 8,
- 15
- ],
- ""type"": ""integer"",
- ""format"": ""int32""
- }
- }
- }
-}", result, ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true);
+var expected = new
+{
+ openapi = "3.0.1",
+ info = new { title = "API 2.0", version = "2.0" },
+ paths = new
+ {
+ ["/Fake"] = new
+ {
+ get = new
+ {
+ tags = new[] { "Fake" },
+ parameters = new[]
+ {
+ new
+ {
+ name = "details",
+ @in = "query",
+ schema = new { @ref = "#/components/schemas/FaultSensitivityDetails" }
+ }
+ },
+ responses = new { _200 = new { description = "OK" } }
+ }
+ }
+ },
+ components = new
+ {
+ schemas = new
+ {
+ FaultSensitivityDetails = new
+ {
+ @enum = new[] { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 15 },
+ type = "integer",
+ format = "int32"
+ }
+ }
+ }
+};
+
+var actual = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<JsonElement>(result);
+var expectedJson = JsonSerializer.Serialize(expected);
+Assert.Equal(expectedJson, actual.GetRawText(), ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Assert.Equal(@"{ | |
| ""openapi"": ""3.0.1"", | |
| ""info"": { | |
| ""title"": ""API 2.0"", | |
| ""version"": ""2.0"" | |
| }, | |
| ""paths"": { | |
| ""/Fake"": { | |
| ""get"": { | |
| ""tags"": [ | |
| ""Fake"" | |
| ], | |
| ""parameters"": [ | |
| { | |
| ""name"": ""details"", | |
| ""in"": ""query"", | |
| ""schema"": { | |
| ""$ref"": ""#/components/schemas/FaultSensitivityDetails"" | |
| } | |
| } | |
| ], | |
| ""responses"": { | |
| ""200"": { | |
| ""description"": ""OK"" | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| ""components"": { | |
| ""schemas"": { | |
| ""FaultSensitivityDetails"": { | |
| ""enum"": [ | |
| 0, | |
| 1, | |
| 2, | |
| 3, | |
| 4, | |
| 5, | |
| 7, | |
| 8, | |
| 15 | |
| ], | |
| ""type"": ""integer"", | |
| ""format"": ""int32"" | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }", result, ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true); | |
| var expected = new | |
| { | |
| openapi = "3.0.1", | |
| info = new { title = "API 2.0", version = "2.0" }, | |
| paths = new | |
| { | |
| ["/Fake"] = new | |
| { | |
| get = new | |
| { | |
| tags = new[] { "Fake" }, | |
| parameters = new[] | |
| { | |
| new | |
| { | |
| name = "details", | |
| @in = "query", | |
| schema = new { @ref = "#/components/schemas/FaultSensitivityDetails" } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| responses = new { _200 = new { description = "OK" } } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| components = new | |
| { | |
| schemas = new | |
| { | |
| FaultSensitivityDetails = new | |
| { | |
| @enum = new[] { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 15 }, | |
| type = "integer", | |
| format = "int32" | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| var actual = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<JsonElement>(result); | |
| var expectedJson = JsonSerializer.Serialize(expected); | |
| Assert.Equal(expectedJson, actual.GetRawText(), ignoreLineEndingDifferences: true); |
1 participant
PR Classification
Migration of
Cuemon.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCoretoCodebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.PR Summary
The project has been rebranded and restructured, with updates to documentation, build scripts, and configuration files to align with the new project name and structure.
swashbuckle-aspnetcore,The decision to move Swashbuckle.AspNetCore extensions out of Cuemon for .NET is to be more true to original vision and to provide faster updates with a tighter focus.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCorewith enhanced Swagger documentation capabilities.Documentation
Bug Fixes
Chores
ClassLibrary1project.