xUnit Ext. CI/CD Pipeline #129
pipelines.yml
on: workflow_dispatch
Matrix: call-build
Matrix: call-test
Matrix: call-pack
call-sonarcloud
/
🔬 Code Quality Analysis
1m 32s
call-codecov
/
📊 Code Coverage Analysis
12s
call-codeql
/
🛡️ Security Analysis
1m 30s
call-nuget
/
deploy
call-nuget
/
deploy_environment
Annotations
1 error and 12 warnings
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis
Encountered a fatal error while running "/opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/2.23.2/x64/codeql/codeql database finalize --finalize-dataset --threads=4 --ram=14581 /home/runner/work/_temp/codeql_databases/csharp". Exit code was 32 and last log line was: CodeQL detected code written in C# but this run didn't build any of it, or CodeQL could not process any of it. Ensure that you have provided manual build steps (see https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/codeql-code-scanning-for-compiled-languages#about-specifying-build-steps-manually) for C# between the 'init' and 'analyze' Actions, and check the workflow run logs (see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/monitoring-and-troubleshooting-workflows/using-workflow-run-logs). For more information, review our troubleshooting guide at https://gh.io/troubleshooting-code-scanning/no-source-code-seen-during-build . See the logs for more details.
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/MinimalHostTest.cs#L66
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/HostTest.cs#L91
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/MinimalHostTest.cs#L66
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs#L55
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs#L54
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting/HostTest.cs#L91
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/TestOutputHelperExtensions.cs#L50
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/TestOutputHelperExtensions.cs#L23
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/TestOutputHelperExtensions.cs#L50
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit/TestOutputHelperExtensions.cs#L23
Use 'ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull' instead of explicitly throwing a new exception instance (https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1510)
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis
Unable to validate code scanning workflow: MissingPushHook
|
call-codeql / 🛡️ Security Analysis
1 issue was detected with this workflow: Please specify an on.push hook to analyze and see code scanning alerts from the default branch on the Security tab.
|