Ossf/gha scorecard #10
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include modifications to existing GitHub Actions workflows and the addition of a new workflow. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (2)
11-18: Consider adding a timeout for the analysis jobWhile the job configuration is correct, consider adding a
timeout-minutessetting to ensure the job doesn't hang indefinitely in case of issues.analysis: name: Scorecard analysis runs-on: ubuntu-latest + timeout-minutes: 30 permissions: security-events: write id-token: write
25-31: Consider additional Scorecard configuration optionsThe Scorecard action configuration is functional but could be enhanced with additional options for better security insights.
- name: "Run analysis" uses: ossf/[email protected] with: results_file: results.sarif results_format: sarif publish_results: true + repo_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + enableLicenseCheck: true + enableDependencySnapshot: true
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/scorecard.yml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (2)
32-42: LGTM! Well-configured artifact handling and code-scanning integration
The artifact upload and code-scanning integration are properly configured with appropriate retention settings and SARIF file handling.
1-10: Verify the cron schedule timing for global coverage
The workflow configuration looks good with appropriate triggers and permissions. However, consider if the scheduled time (17:45 UTC on Tuesdays) is optimal for your global team's visibility and response capability.
✅ Verification successful
Scheduled workflow timing is appropriate and non-conflicting
The cron schedule at 17:45 UTC on Tuesdays is well-chosen as:
- It's the only scheduled workflow in the repository, avoiding any resource contention
- Mid-week timing allows for team response before the weekend
- The time (17:45 UTC) provides good coverage for teams across American and European time zones during business hours
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other scheduled workflows to avoid overlapping
rg -l "cron:" .github/workflows/ | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "cron:" "$file" -A 1
done
Length of output: 233
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2)
4-4: LGTM! Good security practice.
Explicitly limiting workflow triggers to the main branch is a security best practice that prevents potential abuse from arbitrary branch creation.
6-9: Verify security impact of ignored paths.
While ignoring non-code paths is efficient, we should verify that no security-critical paths are accidentally excluded.
Let's check the contents and patterns of ignored directories:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the contents of the markdown files to ensure no critical workflow or security documentation is being ignored.
Ignored paths are safe and contain only non-critical files
Based on the verification:
.docfx/only contains documentation-related files and build scripts.nuget/contains package metadata and documentation.codecov/directory doesn't exist- Markdown files contain only badges, changelog entries, and general documentation
The ignored paths don't contain any security-critical configuration or workflow files that would need CI validation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify contents of ignored paths for security-critical files
# Check .codecov directory for non-configuration files
echo "Checking .codecov directory:"
fd . .codecov/ 2>/dev/null || echo "Directory not found"
# Check .docfx directory for non-documentation files
echo -e "\nChecking .docfx directory:"
fd . .docfx/ 2>/dev/null || echo "Directory not found"
# Check .nuget directory for non-package files
echo -e "\nChecking .nuget directory:"
fd . .nuget/ 2>/dev/null || echo "Directory not found"
# Check for any workflow files in markdown
echo -e "\nChecking for workflow-related markdown files:"
rg -l "workflow|action|security|pipeline" -g "*.md"
Length of output: 2122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of markdown files for critical information
echo "Checking README.md content:"
rg "workflow|action|security|pipeline" README.md -C 2
echo -e "\nChecking CHANGELOG.md content:"
rg "workflow|action|security|pipeline" CHANGELOG.md -C 2
Length of output: 2066
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.37% 88.37%
=======================================
Files 17 17
Lines 611 611
Branches 57 57
=======================================
Hits 540 540
Misses 71 71 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
1 participant
This pull request includes several updates to the CI/CD and security workflows, as well as a minor change to the
README.mdfile to add a new badge. The most important changes are divided into workflow improvements and documentation updates.Workflow improvements:
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml: Updated branches configuration for pull requests and modified the paths to be ignored during the workflow..github/workflows/scorecard.yml: Added a new workflow for Scorecard supply-chain security analysis, including scheduled runs and permissions setup.Documentation updates:
README.md: Added an OpenSSF Scorecard badge to the list of badges.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation