fix oxlint #288
fix oxlint #288
Conversation
WalkthroughThis change updates documentation to rename the JavaScript/TypeScript linter tool from "OXC" to "oxlint" throughout the project. It updates the changelog to clarify the tool's branding and performance, replaces all references to "OXC" with "oxlint" in the supported tools documentation, deletes the old OXC documentation file, and introduces a new guide for oxlint with updated details and configuration instructions. No code or exported/public entities were altered. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 LanguageTooldocs/tools/oxlint.md[uncategorized] ~35-~35: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA) ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying coderabbit-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
c544388
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://7d79a8c4.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://fix-oxlint.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/changelog.md (1)
107-110: Unify bullet styling for oxlint under Additional Static Analysis Support.The nested bullets introduce oxlint details, but the top-level line uses “Added oxlint for faster linting” rather than listing the tool name consistently with other items. Consider mirroring the style from the “New Static Analysis Tools” section for clarity:
- - Added oxlint for faster linting - - oxlint is a blazingly fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter written in Rust - - Replaces ESLint for basic linting while maintaining ESLint for more complex rules - - Up to 50-100x faster than traditional ESLint + - **oxlint**: A blazingly fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter written in Rust + - Replaces ESLint for basic linting while maintaining ESLint for more complex rules + - Up to 50-100x faster than traditional ESLint
🛑 Comments failed to post (3)
docs/tools/tools.md (2)
60-60: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix JavaScript casing in table row.
The entry reads “Javascript” but the official spelling is “JavaScript” (capital “S”).
-| Javascript | [Biome][Biome], [oxlint][oxlint] | Code Quality | +| JavaScript | [Biome][Biome], [oxlint][oxlint] | Code Quality |
80-80: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix TypeScript casing in table row.
The entry reads “Typescript” but the official spelling is “TypeScript” (capital “S”).
-| Typescript | [Biome][Biome], [oxlint][oxlint] | Code Quality | +| TypeScript | [Biome][Biome], [oxlint][oxlint] | Code Quality |📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.| TypeScript | [Biome][Biome], [oxlint][oxlint] | Code Quality |docs/tools/oxlint.md (1)
7-11:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove code fences to render ProPlanNotice.
The import and
<ProPlanNotice />are currently inside a code block, so they will render as literal code instead of embedding the notice. They should be placed in raw MDX.- ```mdx-code-block - import ProPlanNotice from '@site/src/components/ProPlanNotice.mdx'; - - <ProPlanNotice /> - ``` + import ProPlanNotice from '@site/src/components/ProPlanNotice.mdx'; + + <ProPlanNotice />
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/changelog.md (1)
107-110: Unify bullet style for additional static analysis tools
In the “Additional Static Analysis Support” list, items are presented as tool names (e.g.,- SQLFluff). The entry- Added oxlint for faster lintingmixes a verb with a tool name. For consistency, consider changing it to- oxlintand moving the performance details into the changelog entry or as sub‑bullets under “oxlint.”docs/tools/oxlint.md (1)
33-37: Nit: add comma for readability
A comma would improve clarity in this sentence.
Apply this diff:- oxlint does not require configuration to run. If no oxlint config file is found and Biome is enabled, CodeRabbit will use Biome instead as oxlint functionality is included within Biome. + oxlint does not require configuration to run. If no oxlint config file is found and Biome is enabled, CodeRabbit will use Biome instead, as oxlint functionality is included within Biome.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~35-~35: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...e is enabled, CodeRabbit will use Biome instead as oxlint functionality is included wit...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
docs/tools/tools.md (1)
108-108: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify removal of stale OXC references
Ensure thatdocs/tools/oxc.mdhas been deleted and that no lingering “OXC” references remain in the repo.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/usr/bin/env bash # Search for any uppercase OXC references in the docs rg -w "OXC" docs/Length of output: 17
I've added checks to confirm the file’s deletion and look for any “oxc” references (case‑insensitive) across the repo:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/usr/bin/env bash # Verify whether docs/tools/oxc.md still exists if [ -e docs/tools/oxc.md ]; then echo "FOUND docs/tools/oxc.md" else echo "docs/tools/oxc.md not found" fi # Search for any references to "oxc" (case-insensitive) rg -i "oxc" .Length of output: 735
Remove stale “oxc” references from docs/tools/oxlint.md
Althoughdocs/tools/oxc.mdhas been deleted, there are still “oxc” mentions in thedocs/tools/oxlint.mdfile—please update or remove them to match the new “oxlint” naming.• docs/tools/oxlint.md: link text and URLs referencing “oxc” (e.g. GitHub repo and website links) should be renamed or updated.
No description provided.