Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @yybearhao, thanks for getting in touch!

Your approach is perfectly correct. You get a warning message, but not an error message, which means the computation successfully completed. The warning is here to inform the user they are slightly deviating from the usual pavo workflow and to ensure this is what they intend.

So, no worries, you can carry on with your analysis using hex.G1_2.

However, we are always keen on getting feedback to improve pavo. Do you have a suggestion for a better way to signal this?

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@yybearhao
Comment options

Answer selected by Bisaloo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants