You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The way lists work have been tripping me up in writing the documentation. I'm documenting how they behave today, but they feel a little too magical. For example, there is different behavior based on the type of the of option.
Perhaps any field could be a list. I could do something like this:
If we were to do that, it would also be interesting to consider if any field could then be polymorphic. For example, what if I wanted a list of strings or numbers?
This polymorphic field type could be interesting to consider outside this context, too. Perhaps any field (not just a list) could be one of multiple types and still be valid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The way lists work have been tripping me up in writing the documentation. I'm documenting how they behave today, but they feel a little too magical. For example, there is different behavior based on the type of the
of
option.Perhaps any field could be a list. I could do something like this:
If we were to do that, it would also be interesting to consider if any field could then be polymorphic. For example, what if I wanted a list of strings or numbers?
This polymorphic field type could be interesting to consider outside this context, too. Perhaps any field (not just a list) could be one of multiple types and still be valid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: