Skip to content

Exploring alternative approaches to lists #88

Open
@seancdavis

Description

@seancdavis

The way lists work have been tripping me up in writing the documentation. I'm documenting how they behave today, but they feel a little too magical. For example, there is different behavior based on the type of the of option.

Perhaps any field could be a list. I could do something like this:

{
  fields: {
    // ...
    tags: { type: 'reference', of: Tag, list: true }
  }
}

If we were to do that, it would also be interesting to consider if any field could then be polymorphic. For example, what if I wanted a list of strings or numbers?

{
  fields: {
    // ...
    someListField: { type: ['string', 'number'], list: true }
  }
}

This polymorphic field type could be interesting to consider outside this context, too. Perhaps any field (not just a list) could be one of multiple types and still be valid.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions