Do not consider PENDING state as healthy #1866
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does:
While working on the PR #1818 I've realized that an ingester is considered healthy for read operations while
PENDING
but not whileJOINING
. From my perspective, an ingester shouldn't be considered healthy whilePENDING
, so I'm suggesting to:PENDING
state as healthyIn the read path, there are some API endpoints like
LabelNames
andLabelValuesForLabelName
for which we query all healthy ingesters (seedistributor.forAllIngesters()
). APENDING
ingester shouldn't hold any data yet, so shouldn't be required to be hit.A comment I've received in a previous discussion on this topic is that this change may introduce quorum issues during ingesters rollout. However, I can't see a real difference compared to when the ingester switches from
PENDING
toJOINING
, considered that we already consider theJOINING
state as unhealthy.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
No issue
Checklist
CHANGELOG.md
updated - the order of entries should be[CHANGE]
,[FEATURE]
,[ENHANCEMENT]
,[BUGFIX]