Description
When coverlet runs on my project it reports 72.7%. When I take the output (I used the opencover reporter) and run that through ReportGenerator, it shows the coverage as 66.7%. If I change the output to Cobertura I get 62.2%
Opening the coverage.xml file I see this summary:
<Summary numSequencePoints="2015"
visitedSequencePoints="1254"
numBranchPoints="142"
visitedBranchPoints="142"
sequenceCoverage="0.727"
branchCoverage="0.727"
maxCyclomaticComplexity="0"
minCyclomaticComplexity="0"
visitedClasses="120"
numClasses="203"
visitedMethods="310"
numMethods="447" />
It looks like the sequenceCoverage
attribute matches what coverlet reports. It looks like visitedSequencePoints / numSequencePoints
matches what ReportGenerator is reporting for Cobertura.
I would expect the two tools to report the same value. I have not yet researched where those numbers are coming from.
Update:
It looks like the problem might be here (https://github.com/tonerdo/coverlet/blob/master/src/coverlet.core/CoverageSummary.cs) where the code takes the average of averages rather than calculating the actual average from the raw data.