-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 772
Inconsistent formatting of "public" and "inline" in sentences #106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
As far as I understand, the rule is to use \tcode{} when referring to syntax appearing in a program, and normal text when we refer to an attribute of a function. For example, a function can be inline even if it's not declared with the |
Editorial meeting consensus: We agree that we use \tcode when referring to syntax, and otherwise not. We should add that to the style guide on the wiki. |
Wiki page was updated. |
This applies to inline, public, protected, private, and friend. Fixes cplusplus#106.
This applies to inline, public, protected, private, and friend. Fixes cplusplus#106.
This applies to inline, public, protected, private, and friend. Fixes cplusplus#106.
This applies to inline, public, protected, private, and friend. Fixes #106.
This applies to inline, public, protected, private, and friend. Fixes cplusplus#106.
There are a bunch of inconsistencies around whether to
\tcode
public
andinline
, e.g. in "public inline member function" throughout the standards text.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: