Skip to content

inconsistency in library type requirements #690

@burblebee

Description

@burblebee

The spec is inconsistent in how the requirements of library types are referenced.
We have:
* "requirements of a mutable random access iterator" vs.
* "requirements of a Random Access Iterator" vs.
* "requirements of a RandomAccessIterator"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions