Skip to content

[2026-03 CWG Motion 9] P3726R2 Adjustments to Union Lifetime Rules#8888

Open
eisenwave wants to merge 4 commits intocplusplus:mainfrom
eisenwave:motions-2026-03-cwg-9
Open

[2026-03 CWG Motion 9] P3726R2 Adjustments to Union Lifetime Rules#8888
eisenwave wants to merge 4 commits intocplusplus:mainfrom
eisenwave:motions-2026-03-cwg-9

Conversation

@eisenwave
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@eisenwave eisenwave commented Mar 29, 2026

@eisenwave eisenwave added this to the post-2026-03 milestone Mar 29, 2026
@brevzin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

brevzin commented Mar 30, 2026

Dunno if we also want to link the other NB comments here (which I forgot to mention in the paper):

  • US 48-086, which is marked a direct dupe of the German one.
  • FR-006-088, which actually asked to revert all of p3074
  • PL-003, which asked to just revert part of p3074 (which this paper does, but goes further).

Fixes NB DE-087 (C++26 CD).
The formal term is just "aggregate", with no type, which is surprising, but oh well.
@eisenwave eisenwave force-pushed the motions-2026-03-cwg-9 branch from b161010 to 597616d Compare March 30, 2026 19:15
@eisenwave
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Dunno if we also want to link the other NB comments here (which I forgot to mention in the paper):

Thanks for the list. I'll leave that up to Thomas. I'm not sure if we want dupes and already closed issues to be referenced in the commit message and/or in the issue.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think we want links to "accepted" NB comments in the commit and in the pull request where the commit contributes to resolving the NB comment. That also includes duplicates (because national bodies ostensibly don't know about each other's comment), but not "rejected; we're going in another direction" issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

3 participants