fix(#1264): resolve introduction TODOs

[ext11n7]

This closes #1264.

The introduction section still contained unresolved TODO markers and placeholder wording.

What is changed here:

• replace the remaining TODO notes with final prose
• keep the surrounding claims tied to the existing citations
• smooth the wording so the section reads as a finished introduction

This makes the paper draft more consistent and removes editorial leftovers from the published text.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Reworked the introduction’s discussion of functional quality and maintainability.
  • Clarified how functional quality can be defined and assessed through requirements compliance, test results, and defect counts.
  • Added context explaining that functional correctness may take priority in safety-, security-, and mission-critical domains.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 36f1466d-c68a-497b-8a62-38246584d078

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22671ba and 708d8cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• wp/sections/introduction.tex

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The introduction’s discussion of functional quality and maintainability was rewritten to add quantification criteria, clarify maintainability’s definition and measurement, and note the priority of functional correctness in safety-, security-, and mission-critical domains.

Changes

Introduction quality discussion

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Quality and maintainability explanation wp/sections/introduction.tex	The paragraph now describes functional-quality quantification through requirements compliance, test results, and defect counts, contrasts this with maintainability measurement, and adds critical-domain context.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly matches the main change: resolving the introduction TODOs in wp/sections/introduction.tex.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR addresses the three TODOs by adding quantification examples, support for maintainability claims, and a correctness-over-maintainability contrast.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The changes stay within the introduction rewrite requested by #1264 and do not introduce unrelated edits.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}